scholarly journals Local irregularity chromatic number of vertex shackle product of graphs

Author(s):  
R Umilasari ◽  
L Susilowati ◽  
Slamin
2020 ◽  
Vol 1538 ◽  
pp. 012009
Author(s):  
B C L Felipe ◽  
A D Garciano ◽  
M A C Tolentino

1985 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 487-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Duffus ◽  
B. Sands ◽  
R. E. Woodrow

Author(s):  
B. Akhavan Mahdavi ◽  
M. Tavakoli ◽  
F. Rahbarnia ◽  
Alireza Ashrafi

A star coloring of a graph [Formula: see text] is a proper coloring of [Formula: see text] such that no path of length 3 in [Formula: see text] is bicolored. In this paper, the star chromatic number of join of graphs is computed. Some sharp bounds for the star chromatic number of corona, lexicographic, deleted lexicographic and hierarchical product of graphs together with a conjecture on the star chromatic number of lexicographic product of graphs are also presented.


2015 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. 243-248
Author(s):  
Flavia Bonomo ◽  
Ivo Koch ◽  
Pablo Torres ◽  
Mario Valencia-Pabon

2019 ◽  
Vol 1211 ◽  
pp. 012003
Author(s):  
Arika Indah Kristiana ◽  
Moh. Imam Utoyo ◽  
Dafik ◽  
Ika Hesti Agustin ◽  
Ridho Alfarisi ◽  
...  

10.37236/796 ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Bartnicki ◽  
B. Brešar ◽  
J. Grytczuk ◽  
M. Kovše ◽  
Z. Miechowicz ◽  
...  

The game chromatic number $\chi _{g}$ is considered for the Cartesian product $G\,\square \,H$ of two graphs $G$ and $H$. Exact values of $\chi _{g}(K_2\square H)$ are determined when $H$ is a path, a cycle, or a complete graph. By using a newly introduced "game of combinations" we show that the game chromatic number is not bounded in the class of Cartesian products of two complete bipartite graphs. This result implies that the game chromatic number $\chi_{g}(G\square H)$ is not bounded from above by a function of game chromatic numbers of graphs $G$ and $H$. An analogous result is derived for the game coloring number of the Cartesian product of graphs.


10.37236/9113 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gábor Simonyi

Shannon OR-capacity $C_{\rm OR}(G)$ of a graph $G$, that is the traditionally more often used Shannon AND-capacity of the complementary graph, is a homomorphism monotone graph parameter therefore $C_{\rm OR}(F\times G)\leqslant\min\{C_{\rm OR}(F),C_{\rm OR}(G)\}$ holds for every pair of graphs, where $F\times G$ is the categorical product of graphs $F$ and $G$. Here we initiate the study of the question when could we expect equality in this inequality. Using a strong recent result of Zuiddam, we show that if this "Hedetniemi-type" equality is not satisfied for some pair of graphs then the analogous equality is also not satisfied for this graph pair by some other graph invariant that has a much "nicer" behavior concerning some different graph operations. In particular, unlike Shannon OR-capacity or the chromatic number, this other invariant is both multiplicative under the OR-product and additive under the join operation, while it is also nondecreasing along graph homomorphisms. We also present a natural lower bound on $C_{\rm OR}(F\times G)$ and elaborate on the question of how to find graph pairs for which it is known to be strictly less than the upper bound $\min\{C_{\rm OR}(F),C_{\rm OR}(G)\}$. We present such graph pairs using the properties of Paley graphs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document