Energy Drinks May Not Impact Excess Postexercise Oxygen Consumption: Considerations for Pre-exercise Test Recommendations

Author(s):  
Nicolas W. Clark ◽  
Valéria L.G. Panissa ◽  
Chad H. Herring ◽  
Erica R. Goldstein ◽  
Jeffrey R. Stout ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. COTTIN ◽  
N. METAYER ◽  
A. G. GOACHET ◽  
V. JULLIAND ◽  
J. SLAWINSKI ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Brunelli ◽  
C. Pompili ◽  
M. Salati

Exercise tests are increasingly used in the preoperative functional evaluation of lung resection candidates. Low-technology exercise tests include six minute walking, shuttle walking and stair climbing. Conflicting evidence has been reported regarding 6 minute walking test. This test should not be used to select patients for lung resection. An incremental shuttle walk test is easier to replicate than 6 minute walking test. Most patients achieving 25 shuttles or 400 m have a maximum oxygen consumption measured at cardiopulmonary exercise test greater than 15 l/Kg/min. Although this test tends to underestimate performance at the lower range compared to peak oxygen consumption it can be used a screening test before lung resection. Excluding patients from operation based on this test alone is however not recommended and a formal cardiopulmonary exercise test should be always used in those walking less than 400 m. Stair climbing has been extensively studied in thoracic surgery. Several studies have found that poor performance in this test is indicative of cardiopulmonary complications and mortality after lung resection. In particular, climbing less than 12 m represents very high risk, whereas climbing more than 22 m is associated with a favourable outcome. Recent guidelines recommend referring all patients climbing lower than 22 m to cardiopulmonary exercise test. Stair climbing can be used as a screening test in cases cardiopulmonary exercise test is not readily available. In general, patients climbing more than 22 m can proceed to surgery without further evaluation.


Metabolism ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 42 (7) ◽  
pp. 822-828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgia C. Frey ◽  
William C. Byrnes ◽  
Robert S. Mazzeo

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 1244-1249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chelsie E. Winchcombe ◽  
Martyn J. Binnie ◽  
Matthew M. Doyle ◽  
Cruz Hogan ◽  
Peter Peeling

Purpose: To determine the reliability and validity of a power-prescribed on-water (OW) graded exercise test (GXT) for flat-water sprint kayak athletes. Methods: Nine well-trained sprint kayak athletes performed 3 GXTs in a repeated-measures design. The initial GXT was performed on a stationary kayak ergometer in the laboratory (LAB). The subsequent 2 GXTs were performed OW (OW1 and OW2) in an individual kayak. Power output (PWR), stroke rate, blood lactate, heart rate, oxygen consumption, and rating of perceived exertion were measured throughout each test. Results: Both PWR and oxygen consumption showed excellent test–retest reliability between OW1 and OW2 for all 7 stages (intraclass correlation coefficient > .90). The mean results from the 2 OW GXTs (OWAVE) were then compared with LAB, and no differences in oxygen consumption across stages were evident (P ≥ .159). PWR was higher for OWAVE than for LAB in all stages (P ≤ .021) except stage 7 (P = .070). Conversely, stroke rate was lower for OWAVE than for LAB in all stages (P < .010) except stage 2 (P = .120). Conclusions: The OW GXT appears to be a reliable test in well-trained sprint kayak athletes. Given the differences in PWR and stroke rate between the LAB and OW tests, an OW GXT may provide more specific outcomes for OW training.


2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (5S) ◽  
pp. 246
Author(s):  
James W. Navalta ◽  
Elizabeth A. Tanner ◽  
Debra K. Tacad ◽  
Nathaniel G. Bodell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document