Risks of controlled substance drug diversion

Author(s):  
Teresa K Ash ◽  
Gina Murray ◽  
Rebekah V Hiler
2005 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 977-983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karren Crowson ◽  
Mary Monk-Tutor

Purpose Use of automated controlled substance cabinets (ACSCs) for storage and distribution of narcotics can provide documentation necessary to identify and detect drug diversion. This study investigated how ACSCs are used for narcotic control in US hospitals (including a comparison of detection rates pre- and post-automations) and looked at the difference between hospitals that used ACSCs vs those that did not; it also identified hospital policies related to drug diversion. Methods A survey mailed to a national sample of 311 hospitals achieved a 22% usable response rate. Data were entered into an Excel database and analyzed using descriptive statistics; diversion detection rates were calculated per 100 beds. Detection rates were defined as the average number of employees per year that were detected diverting controlled substances over the 3-year period (both pre- and post-ACSC installation); detection rates for those still using manual systems were defined in the same way but only for the 3-year period just prior to the study. Calculation of diversion detection rates were based on respondent estimates of such occurrences. Results Over 80% of the respondents indicated that their institution used an ACSC, and 62% provided the necessary information to calculate a diversion detection of 0.36 per 100 beds pre-automation and 1.12 per 100 beds post-automation (P < 0.001). Out of the 19% of the institutions not using ACSCs, 60% provided the necessary information to calculate a diversion detection rate that was determined to be 0.76 per 100 beds. All respondents reported having policies and procedures related to the diversion of controlled substances; however, they varied significantly regarding drug screening practices and specific conditions for the rehire of staff that were detected diverting drugs. Conclusions When used properly, with effective checks and balances, ACSCs have the capability to improve detection of narcotic diversion; and thus, may help to decrease diversion of controlled substances by health care professionals.


1993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Constance Horgan ◽  
◽  
Jeffrey Prottas ◽  
Christopher Tompkins ◽  
Linda Wastila ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-22
Author(s):  
Colin RW Baird

In this article, I present a firsthand account as an anaesthetist with substance use disorder who has been through rehabilitation and returned to clinical anaesthesia, followed by an overview of substance use disorder in anaesthesia. Substance use disorder is prevalent within the anaesthesia community and can result in tragic consequences, including death in many cases. The incidence is around one to two per 1000 anaesthetist years and this appears to be rising, perhaps mirroring the population-wide increase in substance use disorder as a result of the opioid epidemic. Recognising substance use disorder in a colleague and intervening to try and help them and protect patients can be immensely challenging. Carrying out a successful intervention requires careful planning and coordination in order to protect the affected individual, their colleagues and patients. Returning to clinical anaesthesia following a diagnosis of substance use disorder is also contentious, with the high abstinence rate (relative to the wider substance use disorder population) having to be balanced against the risk of death following relapse. Any return to practice must be well planned and supported, and include appropriate toxicology screening. With such measures, rehabilitation and a return to clinical anaesthesia is possible in certain cases. For the affected individual regaining, then maintaining, their professional identity can be a powerful motivator to remain abstinent. Drug diversion and substance use disorder in anaesthesia is unlikely ever to be fully preventable, but strategies such as biometric dispensing, analysis of unused drugs, random toxicology and ongoing education may help to keep it to a minimum.


2013 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 406-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emory S. Martin ◽  
Steven H. Dzierba ◽  
David M. Jones

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document