The Safety of Operating on Breasts With a History of Prior Reduction Mammoplasty: Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis of Angiogenesis

Author(s):  
Joseph Kyu-hyung Park ◽  
Seokwon Park ◽  
Chan Yeong Heo ◽  
Jae Hoon Jeong ◽  
Bola Yun ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Vascularity of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) is altered after reduction mammoplasty, which increases complications risks after repeat reduction or nipple-sparing mastectomy. Objectives To evaluate angiogenesis of the NAC via serial analysis of breast magnetic resonance images (MRIs). Methods Breast MRIs after reduction mammoplasty were analyzed for 35 patients (39 breasts) using three-dimensional reconstructions of maximal intensity projection images. All veins terminating at the NAC were classified as internal mammary, anterior intercostal, or lateral thoracic in origin. The vein with the largest diameter was considered the dominant vein. Images were classified based on the time since reduction: <6 months, 6-12 months, 12-24 months, >2 years. Results The average number of veins increased over time: 1.17 (<6 months), 1.56 (6–12 months), 1.64 (12–24 months), 1.73 (>2 years). Within 6 months, the pedicle was the only vein. Veins from other sources began to appear at 6–12 months. In most patients, at least two veins were available after 1 year. After 1 year, the internal mammary vein was the most common dominant vein regardless of the pedicle used. Conclusions In the initial 6 months after reduction mammoplasty, the pedicle is the only source of venous drainage; however, additional sources are available after 1 year. The internal thoracic vein was the dominant in most patients. Thus, repeat reduction mammoplasty or nipple-sparing mastectomy should be performed ≥1 year following the initial procedure. After 1 year, the superior or superomedial pedicle may represent the safest option when the previous pedicle is unknown.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 193-193
Author(s):  
Michael Alperovich ◽  
Keith M. Blechman ◽  
Fares Samra ◽  
Richard Shapiro ◽  
Deborah M. Axelrod ◽  
...  

193 Background: Breast cancer resection strives for less radical approaches that offer superior aesthetic results without compromising oncologic safety. Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) has gained popularity, but usually has been offered to smaller breasted and minimally ptotic women without history of extensive breast surgery. We present a series of nine nipple-sparing mastectomies following reduction mammoplasty. Methods: Charts of patients who underwent NSM following reduction mammoplasty at the NYU Medical Center from 2006 through 2011 were reviewed. Outcomes measured include post-operative complications, breast cancer recurrence, presence of cancer in the nipple-areolar complex, and nipple-areolar complex viability. Results: In total, the records of 235 (145 prophylactic, 90 therapeutic) NSM patients at NYU Medical Center were reviewed. Six patients for a total of 9 breasts had NSM following reduction mammoplasty. This subset of patients had a mean age of 46.2, mean BMI of 25.1, no history of diabetes and 1 smoker. Seven of 9 breasts were therapeutic resections and 2 of 9 were prophylactic. Time elapsed between reduction mammoplasty and NSM ranged from 33 days to 11 years. The majority of resections were in Stage 0 patients (6/9) with 1/9 in Stage I and 2/9 in Stage IIA. In all cases, prior reduction mammoplasty incisions were utilized for NSM. Eight patients were reconstructed immediately with tissue expanders, and 1 patient had a latissimus dorsi flap with immediate implant. Complications included 1 hematoma requiring evacuation and 1 displaced implant requiring revision. There were no positive subareolar biopsies and 100% nipple viability. Mean follow-up time was 9.4 months. Conclusions: Our experience demonstrates that NSM can be offered following reduction mammoplasty with comparable reconstructive outcomes to NSM alone. Reduction mammoplasty followed by NSM has potential as a reconstructive tool in prophylactic cases unsuited for primary NSM.





2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 229-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wan-Sze Pek ◽  
Bien-Keem Tan ◽  
Yvonne Ying Ru Ng ◽  
Veronique Kiak Mien Tan ◽  
Mohamed Zulfikar Rasheed ◽  
...  






2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyung Seok Park ◽  
Jeea Lee ◽  
Dong Won Lee ◽  
Seung Yong Song ◽  
Dae Hyun Lew ◽  
...  

Abstract Seeking smaller and indistinct incisions, physicians have attempted endoscopic breast surgery in breast cancer patients. Unfortunately, there are some limitations in the range of movement and visualization of the operation field. Potentially addressing these limitations, we investigated the outcomes of gas and gasless robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy (RANSM) with immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). Ten patients underwent 12 RANSM with IBR between November 2016 and April 2018. Patients with tumors measuring >5 cm in diameter, tumor invasion of the skin or nipple-areolar complex, proven metastatic lymph nodes, or planned radiotherapy were excluded. Age, breast weight, diagnosis, tumor size, hormone receptor status, and operation time were retrospectively collected. Postoperative outcomes including postoperative complications and final margin status of resected were analyzed. The median total operation time and console time were 351 min (267–480 min) and 51 min (18–143 min), respectively. The learning curve presented as a cumulative sum graph showed that the console time decreased and then stabilized at the eighth case. There was no open conversion or major postoperative complication. One patient had self-resolved partial nipple ischemia, and two patients experienced partial skin ischemia. We deemed that RANSM with IBR is safe and feasible for early breast cancer, benign disease of the breast, and BRCA 1/2 mutation carriers. RANSM is an advanced surgical method with a short learning curve.



Author(s):  
Laurence Mercier ◽  
Vladimir Fonov ◽  
Claire Haegelen ◽  
Rolando F. Del Maestro ◽  
Kevin Petrecca ◽  
...  


2008 ◽  
Vol 123 (5) ◽  
pp. 3736-3736
Author(s):  
Kenji Inoue ◽  
Hironori Takemoto ◽  
Tatsuya Kitamura ◽  
Shinobu Masaki ◽  
Hirotake Nakashima


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document