scholarly journals 638 The Implication of Telephone Consultations During COVID-19 Pandemic on Informed Consent

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Ayoub ◽  
F Gareb ◽  
M Akhtar

Abstract Aim Is to find whether telephone consultations have affected patient’s comprehension of the proposed surgical management and possible risks until the day of surgery and accordingly ability for informed consent. Method This study included a sample of patients admitted to QEQM hospital for elective day case surgery during November 2020 and had only telephone consultation when referred for surgery. A feedback survey assessing quality of information given to patients before and on day of surgery was filled by the patients after the procedure. Results The sample included 40 patients undergoing different procedures [cholecystectomy (25), inguinal hernia repair (25), rectal examination under anaesthesia (5), ventral hernia repair (2), incisional hernia (2), inguinal lymph node biopsy (1)]. It was found that 27.5% of patients didn’t have thorough explanation of possible risks and no explanation about postoperative care in 35%.20% were not provided a leaflet about procedure, 57.5% had concerns before surgery and 75% of patients wished for a leaflet with illustrative diagrams, explanation of risks with their management to be able to take the right decision and majority of these patients were from cholecystectomy subgroup. Conclusions The lack of face-face appointment affected greatly the informed consent process resulting in patient dissatisfaction which raised the need for new leaflets containing diagrammatic explanation of procedures and possible risks with their management to ensure fulfilment of autonomy principle.

2013 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 743-751 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herjan Mijderwijk ◽  
Stefan van Beek ◽  
Markus Klimek ◽  
Hugo J. Duivenvoorden ◽  
Frank Grüne ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 116 (2) ◽  
pp. 241-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Chazapis ◽  
E.M.K. Walker ◽  
M.A. Rooms ◽  
D. Kamming ◽  
S.R. Moonesinghe

2013 ◽  
Vol 91 (9) ◽  
pp. 595-601
Author(s):  
José Guillén-Perales ◽  
Aurelio Luna-Maldonado ◽  
María Fernández-Prada ◽  
José Francisco Guillén-Solvas ◽  
Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas

2004 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 472-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niels Lynöe ◽  
Mikael Sandlund ◽  
Lars Jacobsson ◽  
Gunnar Nordberg ◽  
Taiyi Jin

2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riitta A Suhonen ◽  
Mauri K Iivonen ◽  
Maritta A Välimäki

BMJ ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 303 (6803) ◽  
pp. 610-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Lynoe ◽  
M Sandlund ◽  
G Dahlqvist ◽  
L Jacobsson

2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 169-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riitta Suhonen ◽  
Heli Virtanen ◽  
Katja Heikkinen ◽  
Kirsi Johansson ◽  
Anne Kaljonen ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
V.V. Yasyshena

The situation related to the primary documents and the structure of their forms for accounting for intangible assets needs to be resolved. The existence of a number of options for the use of forms of primary documents for accounting for intangible assets, which complicates the documentation process, as the primary forms are partially collected and regulated by several laws and regulations. The need to streamline and summarize the primary documents for accounting for intangible assets and goodwill is emphasized, the order of which should be regulated by a single document. It is recommended to implement the Guidelines for the use of forms of primary accounting of intangible assets and goodwill, with a set of relevant details, which should include documents that will reflect all groups of intangible assets, not just those related to intellectual property. Emphasis was placed on the need to develop primary documentation that will reflect the operations with the formation of intangible assets that will create internal goodwill. It is noted that the use of uniform, agreed forms of primary accounting of intangible assets is also necessary to improve the quality of inspections by regulatory authorities. Primary accounting forms for inventory of intangible assets № IA-4 «Inventory description of intellectual property rights (PR)» and № IA-5 «Inventory description of objects of the right to use natural resources, property and other intangible assets» are developed and recommended to use. It is substantiated to make clarifications and introduce additional details to the inventory descriptions, which is necessary to improve the quality of information formation during the inventory. Emphasis is placed on the need to disclose in the process of inventory objective information about intellectual property objects by checking them for functional compliance, to record the working condition of such objects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document