scholarly journals EP.TH.177Safety profile of SurgiMend Acellular Dermal Matrix and Mentor implant assisted immediate breast reconstruction – Our experience at the Princess Royal University Hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gamal Shaaban ◽  
Maryam Khan ◽  
Lilia Ragad ◽  
Carol Norman ◽  
Abdul Kasem ◽  
...  

Abstract Background ADM (Acellular Dermal Matrix) assisted implant-based immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is a common technique worldwide. Various ADMs are available manufactured from different sources. The Surgimend ADM (fetal bovine dermis) is fenestrated and rich in type I/III collagen; it is claimed to reduce fluid accumulation and promote healing. Methods Retrospective observational analysis exploring safety profile using combination of SurgiMend MacroPorous (MP)/SurgiMend PRS and Mentor CPG/Mentor Siltex implants between January 2018 to December 2019. Patients with unilateral/bilateral IBR following Nipple sparing (NSM) or Skin sparing mastectomy (SSM) were included. The primary outcome was minor complications (seroma (>100ml on USS), hematoma, wound infection and infected seromas). Secondary outcome was major complications (flap necrosis, capsular contracture, implant explantation and Red Breast Syndrome). Results Six (16.2%) bilateral and 31 (83.8%) unilateral IBR were performed in 37 patients. Mean age was 53.78 years. No major complications were recorded. Conclusions The Surgimend ADM and Mentor implant combination demonstrate a good safety profile. Higher rates of seroma in this study could be explained by overdiagnosis and treatment at our unit, which in turn might imply as a result that no major complications were detected and no implant loss.

2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 464
Author(s):  
Geeta Shetty ◽  
Richard Salisbury ◽  
Ashu Gandhi ◽  
Asid Zeiton ◽  
Richard Johnson ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 131 (5) ◽  
pp. 953-961 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naveen M. Krishnan ◽  
Abhishek Chatterjee ◽  
Michael M. Van Vliet ◽  
Stephen G. Powell ◽  
Joseph M. Rosen ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 353-358
Author(s):  
Smita Ramanadham ◽  
Chrisovalantis Lakhiani ◽  
Menyoli Malafa ◽  
Michael Lee ◽  
Angela Cheng ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mohammed Attallah Alharbi ◽  
Fahad K. Aljindan ◽  
Reshan Mane Al Reshan ◽  
Khalid Dakhelallah Almutairi ◽  
Fatimah Mofeed Almosabh ◽  
...  

There has been an increase in invasive breast carcinoma which many times end up with a mastectomy. The psychological effects of mastectomy can be overwhelming, urging the need for optimum breast reconstruction procedures. Acellular dermal matrices are widely used nowadays due to their favorable outcomes with a few complications. In this study, we review the literature to explore the different types used, cons, and pros of this procedure. Databases like PubMed, Medline, Web of science, Embase, Google scholar, and Scopus were used and searched for following terms “implant-based reconstruction” or “breast reconstruction” or “acellular dermal matrix”. All studies that discuss the use of acellular dermal matrices for breast reconstructive surgery were included. Acellular dermal matrices may allow a relatively easy, affordable and time-efficient breast reconstructive surgery. They are associated with less incidence of infection and capsular contracture making them an excellent fit for most procedures. However, m ore studies are needed to help understand possible risk factors, and complications and how to avoid them.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document