scholarly journals P-BN42 Percutaneous cholecystostomy - A practice review

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wing Ching Li ◽  
Omar Elboraey ◽  
Mohammad Saeed Kilani ◽  
Kishore Gopaldas Pursnani ◽  
Ilayaraja Rajendran

Abstract Background Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is performed occasionally in a highly selected group of patients with variable outcomes. The World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) updated guidelines(2020) has recommended PC as a treatment modality in patients admitted with ‘acute calculous cholecystitis’(ACC) with  who are not fit for surgery, including septic patients and those who show no improvement on conservative management within 48 hours. An audit was organised to review our patient selection for PC in the last 5 years in comparison to the latest WSES recommendations. Methods A retrospective observational study was conducted using a prospectively collected hospital database on patients who underwent PC between March 2016 and March 2021 in a teaching hospital. The patient cohort who underwent PC were compared and analysed against the set WSES guidelines. Results Some 23 patients were included. The median age was 82 years (range-61-90), with 13 females (56.5%) and 10 males (43.5%).19/23(82.6%) patients were at risk of sepsis on presentation, with two or more amber flag symptoms, whereas 4/23(17.4%) patients presented with confirmed sepsis. 19/23 (82.6%) were deemed unfit for surgery against 4/23 who were deemed fit based on the surgeons assessment. Patients unfit for surgery were treated with antibiotics following a diagnosis of ACC. The median time for patients to undergo PC from admission was 4 days. The 30-day mortality rate was 13 % (n = 3/23). Conclusions The study has demonstrated that our current practice for managing patients admitted with ACC and performing PC are mostly in line with the WSES guidelines. Considering individuals presentation and the surgeons clinical judgement into account, the practice was also likely impacted by COVID-19 the global pandemic. Further clinical studies may be required to determine specific patient groups who would benefit from PC.

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Ansaloni ◽  
M. Pisano ◽  
F. Coccolini ◽  
A. B. Peitzmann ◽  
A. Fingerhut ◽  
...  

HPB Surgery ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dirk J. Gouma ◽  
Huug Obertop

The management of patients with acute calculous cholecystitis has changed during recent years. The etiology of acute cholecystitis is still not fully understood. Infection of bile is relatively unimportant since bile and gallbladder wall cultures are sterile in many patients with acute cholecystitis. Ultrasonography is first choice for diagnosis of acute cholecystitis and cholescintigraphy is second best. Percutaneous puncture of the gallbladder that can be used for therapeutic drainage has also diagnostic qualities. Early cholecystectomy under antibiotic prophylaxis is the treatment of choice, and has been shown to be superior to delayed surgery in several prospective trials. Mortality can be as low as 0.5% in patients younger than 70–80 years of age, but a high mortality has been reported in octogenerians. Selective intraoperative cholangiography is now generally accepted and no advantage of routine cholangiography was shown in clinical trials. Percutaneous cholecystostomy can be successfully performed under ultrasound guidance and has a place in the treatment of severely ill patients with acute cholecystitis. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be done safely in patients with acute cholecystitis, but extensive experience with this technique is necessary. Endoscopic retrograde drainage of the gallbladder by introduction of a catheter in the cystic duct is feasible but data are still scarce.


2008 ◽  
Vol 134 (4) ◽  
pp. A-860-A-861
Author(s):  
Orly Barak ◽  
Ram Elazay ◽  
Liat Appelbaum ◽  
Avraham Rivkind ◽  
Gidon Almogy

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document