30th National Meeting of the American Association for Clinical Chemistry

1979 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 2049-2049
Keyword(s):  
Dextran Sulfate ◽  
American Association ◽  
Clinical Chemistry ◽  
National Meeting ◽  
Left Hand ◽  
The Third ◽  
Hand Column ◽  
Reference Methods ◽  
Coefficients Of Variation

Abstract Vol. 24 On pages 952 and 1007, add to the authors of abstracts No. 096 and 097 the name W. D. Hemphill in each case. Vol. 25 p. 836: Under "Reference Methods," the word "now" in the first sentence of the third paragraph should read "not." p 939: In this paper the coefficients of variation were calculated incorrectly, The correct values for the CV's, and the area and SD for delipidated apoAI assay, are: dextran sulfate precipitation, 1.18; sodium phosphotungstate precipitation, 1.1; Laurell electrophoresis for ApoAI (a) intact lipoproteins 0.95; (b) delipidated serum, 14 samples, area m 31.34, SD, 0.3, CV = 0.96; Laurell for apoAII (a) intact lipoproteins, 0.94; (b) delipidated serum, 0.97. p 1487: At the time this report was published, author Butrimovitz was an AACC Congressional Fellow to Congressman Leland. p 1512: Delete the extra line just above Figure 1 in the left-hand column. Correct the title in column 3 to read "Amperometric," and in the Figure to that Letter, change "0.5 pg" to "50 pg" and "1.5 pg" to "150 pg." p 1822: In the paragraph preceding the Discussion, the second sentence should read: "During this admission the CaT values generally were above normal, ranging from 2.78 to 3.03 mmol/L; however, the CaF values were normal on four occasions, ranging from 1.14 to 1.24 mmol/L."

Interferographs. Users' Guide to Interferences in Clinical Chemistry Instruments. M. R. Glick and K. W. Ryder. Indianapolis: Science Publishers, Inc., 1987, viii + 190 pp, paperback, $20.00. ISBN 0-930116-07-0

1989 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 670-670
Author(s):  
Donald S Young
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Chemistry ◽  
Manual Method ◽  
The Third ◽  
Hand Column ◽  
Automated Method ◽  
Right Hand

Abstract p 800: In the first column, the correct name (and the address) of the publisher is Science Enterprises, Inc., Box 88443, Indianapolis, IN 46208. p 1018: Richard Patrick should be added to the list of authors. p 1110: Corrections to this paper are detailed in a Letter by Hammer, Vol. 35, p 193. p 1800: Column two, line nine: "12.5" should read "125." p 1801: Column one, "Linearity" paragraph: "HDL-C" should read "HDL-FC" in lines nine and 14. p 1803: Column two, last sentence in first full paragraph should read "...automated method, the interferences with the manual method were less." p 2017: In the legend to Figure 1, the equation for G7 should read: y = -4012 x + 18. In Figure 2, there should be three dots above the 7 glucosyl units coordinate, the third being between the curve and the point just above the curve. p 2045: In Figure 1 (right), read "41" instead of "91" in the integration values for the 2-3a fraction assay. p 2141: Right-hand column, line 16: the formula for CNP-NAG should contain two N atoms. Vol. 35: p. 17: In the last part of the equation, "0.0835" should read "0.00835", and "0.0759" should read "0.00759." p 517: See correction note in "The Clinical Chemist."

Corrections

1978 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 834-834
Keyword(s):  
Left Hand ◽  
Standard Curve ◽  
The Third ◽  
Glycocholic Acid ◽  
Hand Column

Abstract volume23 p 900: Insert decimal in figures in Table 1, to read: See Table in the pdf File p 2067, left-hand column, line 8: mp is 106-107.5 °C p 2108: The first equation in column two should read See equation in the pdf File p 2109: Under the section on Standard curve, the third sentence has a part missing; it should read "the midrange (Table 2) of the [U-3H]glycochenodeoxycholic acid (c - 20.6 ± 7) and of the [U-3H]glycocholic acid. ...". In the last paragraph of this paper, the correct references are (5-7, 9). p 2189: In this paper, Figures 3 and 4b should be interchanged. volume24 The addresses of the authors of the notes beginning on pages 149 and 150 were inadvertently interchanged.

scholarly journals IV. On the determination of the terms in the disturbing function of the fourth order as regards the eccentricities and inclinations which give rise to secular inequali­ties

1835 ◽  
Vol 125 ◽  
pp. 57-81
Keyword(s):  
Fourth Order ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Disturbing Function ◽  
Left Hand ◽  
The Third ◽  
Hand Column ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Analytical Expressions

Hitherto in the theory of the secular inequalities the terms in the disturbing function of the fourth order as regards the inclinations have been neglected. As the magnitude of these terms depends, in great measure, upon certain numerical co­efficients, it is impossible to form any precise notion à priori with respect to their amount, and as to the error which may arise from neglecting them. I have therefore thought it desirable to ascertain their analytical expressions; and the details of this calculation form the subject of this paper. Some of the secular inequalities which result from these terms are far within the limits of accuracy which Laplace appears to have contemplated in the third volume of the Mécanique Céleste. The method which I have here adopted for developing the disturbing function rests upon principles which I have already explained. Very little trouble is requisite to obtain certain analytical expressions for the terms upon which the secular inequalities depend, or for any others, in the development of the disturbing function; but it is not so easy to put these expressions in the simplest form of which they are susceptible; and this is a point to which I think hitherto sufficient attention has not been paid. It will be found that I have obtained, finally, expressions of very remarkable sim­plicity; to accomplish this, however, I have been obliged to go through tedious pro­cesses of reduction, the details of which are here subjoined, in order that my results may be verified or corrected without difficulty. In order to give an additional example of the great facility with which terms in the disturbing function are arrived at by my method, I have calculated one of those given by Professor Airy, and which is required in the determination of his inequality of Venus; and I have arrived at the result which he has given. The same method, with certain modifications, is applicable to the de­velopment of the disturbing function in terms of the true longitudes. The terms in the disturbing function which give rise to the secular inequalities of the elliptic constants, when the terms of the order of the fourth powers of the eccentricities and inclinations are retained, and higher powers of those quantities are neglected, are as follows: and I propose, as they form, in fact, a system apart, to distinguish them by the indices given in the left-hand column.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document