MIDCAB vs OPCAB for severe coronary artery disease: a comparative study

Background/Introduction MIDCAB (minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery) ± PCI/DES was compared to classical “off pump” coronary artery bypass surgery (OPCAB) for the treatment of severe coronary artery disease. Purpose We hypothesized that MIDCAB is associated with reduced perioperative morbidity and mortality. Methods Preoperative and postoperative clinical data were collected prospectively in 329 consecutive patients with severe coronary artery disease undergoing either a MIDCAB procedure ± PCI/DES (MIDCAB group), n=118 patients, or classical OPCAB (OPCAB group), n=211 patients, at our institution from January 2017 to July 2019. A matched analysis using the EuroSCORE II (81 patients per group) was done. Results The median of EuroSCORE II was 1.05 in both groups, p=1. All MIDCAB patients underwent a left-sided mini-thoracotomy and received a single LIMA-LAD graft, OPCAB patients received median 3 distal anastomoses, p<0.001. Operative time was shorter in MIDCAB patients, 160min vs. 240min, p<0.001. Maximum postoperative Troponin levels were lower in MIDCAB compared to OPCAB, 105 μg/l vs. 260 μg/l, p<0.001. Intubation time was shorter in MIDCAB, 7.0 h vs. 9.3 h, p=0.04, as was ICU time, p=0.02. Chest tube drainage after 24 hours was lower in MIDCAB patients, 405 mL vs. 555 mL, p<0.001. Transfusions of blood, platelets and fresh frozen plasma were rarely needed. Transfusion of erythrocytes were more common in OPCAB, 19%, vs. MIDCAB, 2.5%, p=0.001. A transient neurological deficit showed one (1.2%) patient in the OPCAB group, non in MIDCAB, p=0.3. A hybrid procedure was performed in 18 MIDCAB patients (22%) and 5 OPCAB patients (6.2%). In-hospital mortality was 0% in the MIDCAB group, and 1.2% in OPCAB patients, p=0.3. Conclusions MIDCAB is a good and safe option to treat severe coronary artery disease. MIDCAB is not only less invasive, but associated with reduced perioperative risk compared to standard OPCAB surgery even if a hybrid procedure is needed. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None