scholarly journals Visceral organ protection in aortic arch surgery: safety of moderate hypothermia

2014 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 438-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Pacini ◽  
A. Pantaleo ◽  
L. Di Marco ◽  
A. Leone ◽  
G. Barberio ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 59 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
PP Urbanski ◽  
A Lenos ◽  
P Bougioukakis ◽  
I Neophytou ◽  
M Zacher ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. E803-E808
Author(s):  
Petar Risteski ◽  
Medhat Radwan ◽  
Gjoko Boshkoski ◽  
Razan Salem ◽  
Annarita Iavazzo ◽  
...  

Background: Reports of minimal invasive aortic arch surgery are scarce. We reviewed our experience with minimal access aortic arch surgery performed through an upper mini-sternotomy, with emphasis on details of operative technique and early and mid-term outcomes. Methods: The medical records of 123 adult patients (mean age 66 ± 12 years), who underwent primary elective minimal access aortic arch surgery in two aortic referral centers, were reviewed. The most common indication was degenerative aortic arch aneurysm in 92 (75%) patients. Standard operative and organ protection techniques used in all patients were upper mini-sternotomy, uninterrupted antegrade cerebral perfusion, and moderate systemic hypothermia (27.4 ± 1°C). Results: Sixty-eight (55%) patients received partial aortic arch replacement; the remaining 55 (45%) patients received total arch replacement, further extended with either a frozen elephant trunk in 43 (35%) patients or a conventional elephant trunk procedure in nine (7%) patients. No conversion to full sternotomy was required. New permanent renal failure occurred in one (0.8%) patient, stroke in two (1.6%), and spinal cord injury in four (3.3%) patients. Early mortality was observed in four (3.3%) patients. At five years, survival was 80 ± 6% and freedom from reoperation was 96 ± 3%. Conclusion: Minimal invasive aortic arch repair through an upper mini-sternotomy can be safely performed, with early and mid-term outcomes well comparable to series performed through a standard median sternotomy.


Author(s):  
Paul P. Urbanski ◽  
Aristidis Lenos ◽  
Petros Bougioukakis ◽  
Ioannis Neophytou ◽  
Michael Zacher ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 146 (3) ◽  
pp. 662-667 ◽  
Author(s):  
January Y. Tsai ◽  
Wei Pan ◽  
Scott A. LeMaire ◽  
Paul Pisklak ◽  
Vei-Vei Lee ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maximilian Luehr ◽  
Jean Bachet ◽  
Friedrich-Wilhelm Mohr ◽  
Christian D. Etz

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu. V. Belov ◽  
E. R. Charchyan ◽  
B. A. Akselyrod ◽  
D. A. Gusykov ◽  
S. V. Fedulova ◽  
...  

<p><strong>Aim.</strong> The study is aimed at presenting the protocol of intraoperative organ protection, analyzing its effectiveness during aortic arch surgery and evaluating the rate of postoperative complications in this group of patients. <br /><strong>Methods.</strong> The study included 141 patients. In the first group (n=70) patients underwent aortic arch surgery with hypothermic circulatory arrest (target core temperature 26 °C) and antegrade cerebral perfusion. Patients of the second group (n=71) underwent ascending aortic replacement using cardiopulmonary bypass with moderate hypothermia (target core temperature 32 °C). Cerebral and tissue oxygenation monitoring was performed in all the cases. In the first group transcranial Doppler monitoring was also performed. 33 patients in the first group and 34 patients in the second group underwent testing before and after surgery in order to evaluate cognitive function. Patients’ condition was evaluated during the in-hospital period that was about 15.97±20.54 days. <br /><strong>Results.</strong> In-hospital mortality rate was 4,2 % in the first group and 0% in the second one (p=0.12). Stroke was observed in 1.4 and 0 % of cases respectively. The rate of encephalopathy (as the leading symptom) was 7.1 and 5.6 % in 1st and 2nd groups respectively. Multimodal monitoring enabled to dynamically adjust the flow rate of antegrade cerebral perfusion. As a result, cerebral SctO2 and linear velocity were maintained within the acceptable range.<br /><strong>Conclusion.</strong> The presented protocol proved to be effective, it allows to perform aortic arch surgery with the same postoperative neurological complications’ rate as after ascending aortic replacement. We recommend performing reconstructive aortic arch surgery by using moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest (26-28 °С) and selective antegrade cerebral perfusion. In this modality, it is important to perform the distal anastomosis quickly and start patient’s rewarming (this will significantly shorten the duration of cardiopulmonary bypass and, as a result, decrease the rate of postoperative complications) and to carry out both precise intraoperative monitoring of the brain condition (by using cerebral oxymetry and transcranial Doppler) and central core temperature.</p><p>Received 21 June 2016. Accepted 21 October 2016.</p><p><strong>Funding:</strong> The study had no sponsorship.<br /><strong>Conflict of interest:</strong> The authors declare no conflict of interest.<br /><strong>Author contributions</strong><br />Conceptualization and study design: Belov Yu.V., Charchyan E.R., Akselrod B.A.<br />Material acquisition and analysis: Khachatryan Z.R., Oystrakh A.S., Medvedeva L.A., Guskov D.A., Fedulova S.V.<br />Statistical data processing: Khachatryan Z.R., Guskov D.A., Skvortsov A.A.<br />Article writing: Akselrod B.A., Khachatryan Z.R., Skvortsov A.A. <br />Review &amp; editing: Charchyan E.R., Akselrod B.A., Eremenko A.A., Belov Yu.V.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document