scholarly journals Repeat left ventricular assist device exchange with inflow or outflow correction for recurrent pump thrombosis and cerebral haemorrhage through limited incisions†

2018 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 781-783 ◽  
Author(s):  
Medhat Radwan ◽  
Petar Risteski ◽  
Richard Hoffmann ◽  
Aron-Frederik Popov
2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marian Urban ◽  
John Um ◽  
Michael Moulton ◽  
Douglas Stoller ◽  
Ronald Zolty ◽  
...  

In selected patients with left ventricular assist device–associated infection or malfunction, pump exchange may become necessary after conservative treatment options fail and heart transplantation is not readily available. We examined the survival and complication rate in patients (⩾19 years of age) who underwent HeartMate II to HeartMate II exchange at our institution from 1 January 2010 to 28 February 2018. Clinical outcomes were analyzed and compared for patients who underwent exchange for pump thrombosis (14 patients), breach of driveline integrity (5 patients), and device-associated infection (2 patients). There were no differences in 30-day mortality (p = 0.58), need for temporary renal replacement therapy (p = 0.58), right ventricular mechanical support (p = 0.11), and postoperative stroke (p = 0.80) among groups. Survival at 1 year was 90% ± 7% for the whole cohort and 85% ± 10% for those who underwent exchange for pump thrombosis. In patients exchanged for device thrombosis, freedom from re-thrombosis and survival free from pump re-thrombosis at 1 year were 49% ± 16% and 42% ± 15%, respectively. No association of demographic and clinical variables with the risk of recurrent pump thrombosis after the first exchange was identified. Survival after left ventricular assist device exchange compares well with published results after primary left ventricular assist device implantation. However, recurrence of thrombosis was common among patients who required a left ventricular assist device exchange due to pump thrombosis. In this sub-group, consideration should be given to alternative strategies to improve the outcomes.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (S15) ◽  
pp. S1728-S1736 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasmin S. Hanke ◽  
Günes Dogan ◽  
Leonard Wert ◽  
Marcel Ricklefs ◽  
Jan Heimeshoff ◽  
...  

ASAIO Journal ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 307-317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica G.Y. Luc ◽  
Vakhtang Tchantchaleishvili ◽  
Kevin Phan ◽  
Shannon M. Dunlay ◽  
Simon Maltais ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 039139882110416
Author(s):  
Miroslav Konarik ◽  
Ivan Netuka ◽  
Peter Ivak ◽  
Hynek Riha ◽  
Zuzana Tucanova ◽  
...  

Introduction: Inherited thrombophilias represent a concerning risk factor due to a proclivity to an aberrant clot formation. However, in patients with left ventricular assist device (LVAD), their impact on bleeding and thrombotic complications remains still poorly understood. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of thrombophilic mutation directed anticoagulation therapy on adverse clinical outcomes in LVAD patients. Materials and methods: About 138 consecutive patients indicated for LVAD implant (HeartMate II, Abbott, Plymouth, USA) were prospectively screened for three major thrombophilic mutations: factor II (prothrombin), factor V Leiden, and homozygous methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR). Subsequently, discordant individualized anticoagulation targets of INR 2.5–3.0 in thrombophilia positive and INR 1.8–2.2 in negative patients were established; notably without anti-platelet agents given the center standard of care. Results: Mean age was 50 ± 12.7 years, 83% male. Mean duration of support was 464.5 days (SD 482.9; SEM 41.1) and median of 310 days (IQR 162; 546). Full thrombophilia positive cohort analysis has not revealed any significant impact on event free survival. In contrast, detailed analysis of specific thrombophilias subsets has revealed Factor II prothrombin mutation as a significant predisposition for the pump thrombosis risk (SHR 10.48; p = 0.001) despite more aggressive prespecified anticoagulation target. Moreover, the incidence of bleeding events in prothrombin group was also significantly increased (SHR 6.0; p = 0.03). Conclusions: Our observations suggest that specific thrombophilias in LVAD patients may pose different intensity predisposition for thrombotic complications. Factor II (prothrombin) positive mutation was identified as significant risk factor associated with the pump thrombosis.


ASAIO Journal ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brendan P. Chou ◽  
Harveen K. Lamba ◽  
Faisal H. Cheema ◽  
Andrew B. Civitello ◽  
Reynolds M. Delgado ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 1005-1014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas E. Hurst ◽  
Andrew Xanthopoulos ◽  
John Ehrlinger ◽  
Jeevanantham Rajeswaran ◽  
Amol Pande ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 108 (4) ◽  
pp. 1178-1182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richa Agarwal ◽  
Andreas Kyvernitakis ◽  
Behzad Soleimani ◽  
Carmelo A. Milano ◽  
Robert Patrick Davis ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document