scholarly journals TAVR in patients with low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis – outcome data after three years from one large centre

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Steffen ◽  
N Reissig ◽  
M Zadrozny ◽  
J Fischer ◽  
D Andreae ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Stroke Volume Index ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Severe Aortic Regurgitation ◽  
Sts Score ◽  
Baseline Characteristics

Abstract Background The outcome of patients with low-flow low-gradient (LFLG) aortic stenosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is not well evaluated. Long-term clinical success is thought to be less pronounced in LFLG patients compared to patients with high gradient (HG) aortic stenosis. Purpose The purpose of this study was to characterise different LFLG groups and determine their outcome after TAVR. We hypothesised that there would be relevant differences in baseline characteristics and patient survival after TAVR. Methods All patients undergoing TAVR for severe aortic stenosis at our centre between 2013 and 2019 were included in the study. Patients have been split into groups according preinterventional echocardiography data according to mean pressure gradient (dPmean), ejection fraction (EF), and stroke volume index (SVi). Patients with a dPmean <40 mmHg and SVi ≤35 ml/m2 were subdivided into classical low-flow low-gradient (cLFLG, EF <50%) and paradoxical low-flow (pLFLG, EF ≥50%). Patients with previous aortic valve replacement or severe aortic regurgitation were excluded from the analysis. Results 1,772 patients were analysed (mean follow-up 2.2 years, median age 81.7 [77.5–85.7] years) and split into groups: HG, 953 patients (54.3%), cLFLG, 446 patients (25.2%), and pLFLG 373 patients (21.1%). Baseline characteristics showed significant differences (p<0.01), among others, in sex (male sex, HG 46.1% vs. cLFLG 69.5% vs. pLFLG 44.5%), rate of atrial fibrillation (HG 20.3% vs. cLFLG 36.3% vs. pLFLG 41.6%), coronary artery disease (HG 56.2% vs. cLFLG 73.5% vs. pLFLG 63.4%), and grade 3 or 4 mitral regurgitation (HG 2.2% vs. cLFLG 5.5% vs. pLFLG 6.8%). Accordingly, Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Scores differed significantly: HG, 3.0 [2.0–5.0], cLFLG, 5.0 [3.0–7.3] pLFLG, 3.9 [2.2–6.0] (p<0.01). Rates of periprocedural complications including death, device failure, pericardial effusion, stroke or myocardial infarction were comparable between groups. Mortality rate (figure 1) was highest for cLFLG patients (43.4% [95% confidence interval, 37.3–48.6%]) compared to HG (25.1% [21.6–28.5%]) or pLFLG (32.9% [26.9–38.4%]), Log-rank test, <0.001. Corresponding hazard ratios were 2.1 [1.7–2.6] (p<0.001) for cLFLG and 1.5 [1.2–2.0] (p<0.001) for pLFLG. Similar results were obtained when adjusting to STS score (figure 2). Conclusion In this all-comer analysis, almost half of the patients belong toLFLG groups with considerable differences in patient characteristics. While equally safe during the procedure, patients with LFLG aortic stenosis show increased 3-year mortality rates compared to patients with HG aortic stenosis. Further studies evaluating this are needed. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1. 3-year mortality Figure 2. STS score-adjusted mortality

scholarly journals IMPORTANCE OF AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT ON STROKE VOLUME INDEX IN LOW FLOW SEVERE AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS

2014 ◽  
Vol 63 (12) ◽  
pp. A2000
Author(s):  
Jordi S. Dahl ◽  
Kristian Wachtell ◽  
Lars Videbaek ◽  
Mikael K. Poulsen ◽  
Nicolaj Christensen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Stroke Volume ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Aortic Valve Stenosis ◽  
Stroke Volume Index ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Volume Index

scholarly journals The Association between Aortic Valve Weight, Echocardiographic Indices, and All-Cause Death in 1,046 Patients Undergoing Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis

Cardiology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 145 (4) ◽  
pp. 251-261
Author(s):  
Jonathan Weber ◽  
Simcha Pollack ◽  
Florentina Petillo ◽  
Ana Anagnostopoulos ◽  
J. Jane Cao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Stroke Volume Index ◽  
Continuous Variable ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Impact On Survival

Background: Aortic valve weight (AVW), a flow independent measure of aortic stenosis (AS) severity, is reported to have heterogeneous associations with the echocardiographic variables used for AS evaluation. Controversy exists regarding its impact on survival after aortic valve replacement (AVR). Objective: We sought to determine the association between AVW with echocardiographic measures of AS severity and all-cause mortality after surgical AVR. Methods: One thousand and forty-sixconsecutive patients underwent surgical AVR for AS, the excised valves were weighed, and an echocardiogram was done before surgery. Results: Males had heavier valves than females, for both absolute and body surface are (BSA)-indexed values (2.78 ± 1.23 vs. 2.08 ± 0.68 g, p < 0.001; and 1.38 ± 0.61 vs. 1.19 ± 0.41 g/m2, p < 0.001, respectively). In a restricted cohort of 634 patients with isolated severe AS and normal ejection fraction, the correlations of AVW with echocardiographic variables of AS were modest, the strongest being with the dimensionless index (r = –0.27 and –0.26 for male and female, both p < 0.01). Stratified by stroke volume index and mean gradient (MG), no associations were found in the low-gradient groups (i.e., MG <40 mmHg). At a median follow-up of 3.5 years, there were only 244 deaths in the entire cohort. Mortality was not related to AVW, except in females who displayed an inverse relationship (HR = 0.67; 95% CI 0.47–0.95) only when it was analyzed as a continuous variable. Conclusions: The weak correlation between AVW with the echocardiographic indices of AS may reflect its complex pathophysiology, heterogeneous hemodynamics, and possible pitfalls in the current echocardiographic methods used in clinical practice. The prognostic value of AVW after AVR warrants further evaluation.

scholarly journals Impact of the Trifecta bioprosthetic valve in patients with low-flow severe aortic stenosis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tohru Takaseya ◽  
Atsunobu Oryoji ◽  
Kazuyoshi Takagi ◽  
Tomofumi Fukuda ◽  
Koichi Arinaga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Stroke Volume Index ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Effective Orifice Area ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Hemodynamic Performance ◽  
Mid Term Results

AbstractAortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valve disorder in advanced age. Previous reports have shown that low-flow status of the left ventricle is an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality after surgery. The Trifecta bioprosthesis has recently shown favorable hemodynamic performance. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the Trifecta bioprosthesis, which has a large effective orifice area, in patients with low-flow severe AS who have a poor prognosis. We retrospectively evaluated 94 consecutive patients with severe AS who underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR). Patients were divided into two groups according to the stroke volume index (SVI): low-flow (LF) group (SVI < 35 ml/m2, n = 22) and normal-flow (NF) group (SVI ≥ 35 ml/m2, n = 72). Patients’ characteristics and early and mid-term results were compared between the two groups. There were no differences in patients’ characteristics, except for systolic blood pressure (LF:NF = 120:138 mmHg, p < 0.01) and the rate of atrial fibrillation between the groups. A preoperative echocardiogram showed that the pressure gradient was higher in the NF group than in the LF group, but aortic valve area was similar. The Trifecta bioprosthesis size was similar in both groups. The operative outcomes were not different between the groups. Severe patient–prosthesis mismatch (PPM) (< 0.65 cm2/m2) was not observed in either of the groups. There were no significant differences in mid-term results between the two groups. The favorable hemodynamic performance of the Trifecta bioprosthesis appears to have the similar outcomes in the LF and NF groups. AVR with the Trifecta bioprosthesis should be considered for avoidance of PPM, particularly in AS patients with LV dysfunction.

True-severe stenosis in paradoxical low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis: outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taishi Okuno ◽  
Noé Corpataux ◽  
Giancarlo Spano ◽  
Christoph Gräni ◽  
Dik Heg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Functional Status ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
High Gradient ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve

Abstract Aims The ESC/EACTS guidelines propose criteria that determine the likelihood of true-severe aortic stenosis (AS). We aimed to investigate the impact of the guideline-based criteria of the likelihood of true-severe AS in patients with low-flow low-gradient (LFLG) AS with preserved ejection fraction (pEF) on outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Methods and results In a prospective TAVR registry, LFLG-AS patients with pEF were retrospectively categorized into high (criteria ≥6) and intermediate (criteria &lt;6) likelihood of true-severe AS. Haemodynamic, functional, and clinical outcomes were compared with high-gradient AS patients with pEF. Among 632 eligible patients, 202 fulfilled diagnostic criteria for LFLG-AS. Significant haemodynamic improvement after TAVR was observed in LFLG-AS patients, irrespective of the likelihood. Although &gt;70% of LFLG-AS patients had functional improvement, impaired functional status [New York Heart Association (NYHA III/IV)] persisted more frequently at 1 year in LFLG-AS than in high-gradient AS patients (7.8%), irrespective of the likelihood (high: 17.4%, P = 0.006; intermediate: 21.1%, P &lt; 0.001). All-cause death at 1 year occurred in 6.6% of high-gradient AS patients, 10.9% of LFLG-AS patients with high likelihood [hazard ratio (HR)adj 1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68–3.02], and in 7.2% of those with intermediate likelihood (HRadj 0.92, 95% CI 0.39–2.18). Among the criteria, only the absence of aortic valve area ≤0.8 cm2 emerged as an independent predictor of treatment futility, a combined endpoint of all-cause death or NYHA III/IV at 1 year (OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.14–6.25). Conclusion Patients with LFLG-AS with pEF had comparable survival but worse functional status at 1 year than high-gradient AS with pEF, irrespective of the likelihood of true-severe AS. Clinical Trial Registration https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. NCT01368250.

Abstract 12660: Impact of Aortic Valve Replacement versus Medical Management on Survival of Low Flow Low Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis With Normal Ejection Fraction

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zaher Fanari ◽  
Dimitrios Barmpouletos ◽  
Vivek K Reddy ◽  
Sumaya Hammami ◽  
Zugui Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Normal Ejection Fraction ◽  
Normal Flow ◽  
Log Rank Test

Background: The impact of aortic valve replacement (AVR) versus medical management (MM) in patients with paradoxical low flow is unclear. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes of AVR versus MM in patients with severe aortic stenosis and normal ejection fraction and different transaortic flow and gradient. Methods: We identified consecutive patients presenting to our echo lab with an aortic valve area (AVA) < 1.0cm 2 and EF≥ 50%. We stratify patients depending on gradient (≥ 40 vs. < 40 mmHg) and stroke volume index (SVI < 35 vs. ≥35 ml/m 2 ). 4 groups were identified (, normal flow, high gradient [NF/HG]; normal flow, low gradient [NF/LG]; low flow, high gradient [LF/HG] and low flow, low gradient [LF/LG]. These 4 groups were also stratified depending on management (AVR vs. MM). All patients were retrospectively followed for the occurrence of death. Results: A total of 954 patients were included in analysis. Mean follow up was 2.45 ± 1.9 years. The mean age was 75.4 ± 5.6 years. Comparing all 4 AS subgroups, the mortality was higher in LF/HG followed by LF/LG, NF/HG and NF/LG (LF/HG 37.1% vs. LF/LG 33.9% vs. NF/HG 30.3%vs. NF/LG 20.2%; Log Rank Test, P=0.003). Patients who underwent medical therapy have a higher mortality than the overall cohort in all subgroups (LF/HG 44.3% vs. NF/HG 36.6% vs. LF/LG 33.7% vs. NF/LG 21.2%; Log Rank Test, P=0.001). Patients with HG had a higher chance of getting aortic valve replacement (AVR) than those with LF/LG and NF/LG (20.7% NF/HG vs. 10.6% LF/HG vs. 4.7% LF/LG and 3.6% NF/LG; P=0.01). Patients who underwent AVR had lower mortality rates when compared with the overall cohort in all subgroups (LF/HG 21.4% vs. 18.9% NF/HG vs. 6.6% LF/LG and 7.1% NF/LG; Log Rank Test, P= 0.253). Conclusion: Patients with LF/LG represent an under-recognized high-risk group with similar prognosis to NF/HG. Although these patients may benefit tremendously from AVR, they are less likely to undergo AVR when compared to HG patients.

scholarly journals Low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis: surgical outcomes and mid-term results after isolated aortic valve replacement

2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 1685-1690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Lopez-Marco ◽  
Harriet Miller ◽  
Aprim Youhana ◽  
Saeed Ashraf ◽  
Afzal Zaidi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Mid Term Results

scholarly journals P289 Aortic valve resistance risk-stratifies low-gradient aortic stenosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Cho ◽  
T Uejima ◽  
H Nishikawa ◽  
J Yajima ◽  
T Yamashita
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Stroke Volume ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Stroke Volume Index ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background Grading the severity of aortic stenosis (AS) is challenging, since there is a discrepancy between aortic valve area (AVA) and mean pressure gradient (mPG). Arotic valve resistance (RES) has been proposed as a usuful descriptor of AS severity, but it is not commonly used for clinical decision-making, because its robust validation of clinical-outcome efficacy is lacking. This study aimed to investigate whether RES holds an incremental value for risk-stratifying AS. Methods This study recuited 565 AS patients (AVA &lt; 1.5cm²) referred to echocardiography for valve assessment. The patients were divided into three different groups, according to the guidelines: high-gradient AS (HG-AS, mPG≥40mmHg, n = 157), low-gradient AS (LG-AS, mPG &lt; 40mmHg + AVA ≤ 1.0cm², n = 155) and moderate AS (Mod-AS, mPG &lt; 40mmHg + AVA &gt; 1.0cm², n = 253). RES was calculated from Doppler measurement of mPG and stoke volume. The diagnositic cutoff point for RES was determined at 190 dynes × s×cm-5 by substituting AVA = 1.0cm² and mPG = 40mmHg into the definition formula of RES and Gorlin formula. The patients were followed up for 2 years. The endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, hospitalization for heart failure and aortic valve replacement necessitated by the development of AS-related symptoms. Result Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that LG-AS exhibited an intermediate outcome between HG-AS and Mod-AS (event-free survival at 2 years = 20.9% for HG-AS, 59.7% for LG-AS, 89.9% for Mod-AS, p &lt; 0.001, figure A). When LG-AS was stratified by RES, the survival curves showed a significant separation (event-free survival at 2 years = 35.3% for high RES, 70.7% for low RES, p &lt; 0.001, figure B). This trend persisted even when analysed separately for norml (stroke volume index &gt; 35ml/m²) and low (stroke volume index ≤ 35ml/m²) flow state ((normal flow) event-free survival at 2 years = 38.7% for high RES, 70.4% for low RES, p = 0.023, figure C; (low flow) event-free survival at 2 years = 26.7% for high RES, 74.6% for low RES, p &lt; 0.001, figure D). Conclusion This study confirmed the clinical efficacy of RES for risk-stratifying LG-AS patients. Abstract P289 Figure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document