scholarly journals Antibiotic prescribing for respiratory infections: a cross-sectional analysis of the ReCEnT study exploring the habits of early-career doctors in primary care

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthea Dallas ◽  
Parker Magin ◽  
Simon Morgan ◽  
Amanda Tapley ◽  
Kim Henderson ◽  
...  
BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e020203 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R M Smith ◽  
F Christiaan K Dolk ◽  
Timo Smieszek ◽  
Julie V Robotham ◽  
Koen B Pouwels

ObjectivesTo explore the causes of the gender gap in antibiotic prescribing, and to determine whether women are more likely than men to receive an antibiotic prescription per consultation.DesignCross-sectional analysis of routinely collected electronic medical records from The Health Improvement Network (THIN).SettingEnglish primary care.ParticipantsPatients who consulted general practices registered with THIN between 2013 and 2015.Primary and secondary outcome measuresTotal antibiotic prescribing was measured in children (<19 years), adults (19–64 years) and the elderly (65+ years). For 12 common conditions, the number of adult consultations was measured, and the relative risk (RR) of being prescribed antibiotics when consulting as female or with comorbidity was estimated.ResultsAmong 4.57 million antibiotic prescriptions observed in the data, female patients received 67% more prescriptions than male patients, and 43% more when excluding antibiotics used to treat urinary tract infection (UTI). These gaps were more pronounced in adult women (99% more prescriptions than men; 69% more when excluding UTI) than in children (9%; 0%) or the elderly (67%; 38%). Among adults, women accounted for 64% of consultations (62% among patients with comorbidity), but were not substantially more likely than men to receive an antibiotic prescription when consulting with common conditions such as cough (RR 1.01; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.02), sore throat (RR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.01) and lower respiratory tract infection (RR 1.00, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.01). Exceptions were skin conditions: women were less likely to be prescribed antibiotics when consulting with acne (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.69) or impetigo (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.88).ConclusionsThe gender gap in antibiotic prescribing can largely be explained by consultation behaviour. Although in most cases adult men and women are equally likely to be prescribed an antibiotic when consulting primary care, it is unclear whether or not they are equally indicated for antibiotic therapy.


2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 302-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthea Dallas ◽  
Mieke van Driel ◽  
Simon Morgan ◽  
Amanda Tapley ◽  
Kim Henderson ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (11) ◽  
pp. 781-788
Author(s):  
Hilary Brown ◽  
Amanda Tapley ◽  
Mieke L van Driel ◽  
Andrew R Davey ◽  
Elizabeth Holliday ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (688) ◽  
pp. e794-e800
Author(s):  
Jessica A Lee ◽  
Rachel Meacock ◽  
Evangelos Kontopantelis ◽  
James Matheson ◽  
Matthew Gittins

BackgroundIn April 2016 Greater Manchester gained control of its health and social care budget, a devolution that aimed to reduce health inequities both within Greater Manchester and between Greater Manchester and the rest of the country.AimTo describe the relationship between practice location deprivation and primary care funding and care quality measurements in the first year of Greater Manchester devolution (2016/2017).Design and settingCross-sectional analysis of 472 general practices in Greater Manchester in England.MethodFinancial data for each general practice were linked to the area deprivation of the practice location, as measured by the 2015 Index of Multiple Deprivation. Practices were categorised into five quintiles relative to national deprivation. NHS Payments data and indicators of care quality were compared across social deprivation quintiles.ResultsPractices in areas of greater deprivation did not receive additional funding per registered patient. Practices in less deprived quintiles received higher National Enhanced Services payments from NHS England than practices in the most deprived quintile. A trend was observed towards funding to more deprived practices being supported by Local Enhanced Service payments from clinical commissioning groups, but these represent a small proportion of overall practice income. Practices in less deprived areas had better care quality measurements according to Quality and Outcomes Framework achievement and Care Quality Commission ratings.ConclusionFollowing devolution, primary care practices in Greater Manchester are still reliant on funding from national funding schemes, which poorly reflect its deprivation. The devolved administration’s ability to address health inequities at the primary care level seems uncertain.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document