vertebral fractures
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

2471
(FIVE YEARS 614)

H-INDEX

99
(FIVE YEARS 8)

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nico Sollmann ◽  
Edoardo A. Becherucci ◽  
Christof Boehm ◽  
Malek El Husseini ◽  
Stefan Ruschke ◽  
...  

PurposeOsteoporosis is a highly prevalent skeletal disease that frequently entails vertebral fractures. Areal bone mineral density (BMD) derived from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the reference standard, but has well-known limitations. Texture analysis can provide surrogate markers of tissue microstructure based on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of the spine, thus potentially improving fracture risk estimation beyond areal BMD. However, it is largely unknown whether MRI-derived texture analysis can predict volumetric BMD (vBMD), or whether a model incorporating texture analysis based on CT and MRI may be capable of differentiating between patients with and without osteoporotic vertebral fractures.Materials and MethodsTwenty-six patients (15 females, median age: 73 years, 11 patients showing at least one osteoporotic vertebral fracture) who had CT and 3-Tesla chemical shift encoding-based water-fat MRI (CSE-MRI) available were analyzed. In total, 171 vertebral bodies of the thoracolumbar spine were segmented using an automatic convolutional neural network (CNN)-based framework, followed by extraction of integral and trabecular vBMD using CT data. For CSE-MRI, manual segmentation of vertebral bodies and consecutive extraction of the mean proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and T2* was performed. First-order, second-order, and higher-order texture features were derived from texture analysis using CT and CSE-MRI data. Stepwise multivariate linear regression models were computed using integral vBMD and fracture status as dependent variables.ResultsPatients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures showed significantly lower integral and trabecular vBMD when compared to patients without fractures (p<0.001). For the model with integral vBMD as the dependent variable, T2* combined with three PDFF-based texture features explained 40% of the variance (adjusted R2[Ra2] = 0.40; p<0.001). Furthermore, regarding the differentiation between patients with and without osteoporotic vertebral fractures, a model including texture features from CT and CSE-MRI data showed better performance than a model based on integral vBMD and PDFF only (Ra2 = 0.47 vs. Ra2 = 0.81; included texture features in the final model: integral vBMD, CT_Short-run_emphasis, CT_Varianceglobal, and PDFF_Variance).ConclusionUsing texture analysis for spine CT and CSE-MRI can facilitate the differentiation between patients with and without osteoporotic vertebral fractures, implicating that future fracture prediction in osteoporosis may be improved.


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takefumi Furuya

Abstract Osteoporosis is the one of the major adverse outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Recently, we and others have been reported many clinical observations related to osteoporosis in Japanese RA patients. In this article, I reviewed these findings. Japanese patients with RA have a two-fold risk of fractures compared with those without RA. Among the fractures in Japanese RA patients, three quarters of the fractures were non-vertebral fractures. The incidence of non-vertebral fractures did not change, despite an improvement in RA disease activity. Older age, female gender, history of fractures, history of total knee replacements, disease activity scores in 28 joints (DAS28), health assessment questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI), low bone mineral density, glucocorticoid dose, and vitamin D deficiency were significantly associated with fractures. Older age, high body mass index (BMI), HAQ-DI, and polypharmacy were significantly associated with falls. BMI (both overweight and underweight), DAS28, and HAQ-DI were significantly associated with frailty. Half and three quarters of Japanese men and women with RA had vitamin D deficiency, respectively. The incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw may be higher in Japanese RA patients than those without RA. Undertreatment of osteoporosis appears to exist in Japanese patients with RA.


Bone ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 154 ◽  
pp. 116209
Author(s):  
Piet Geusens ◽  
Robert Feldman ◽  
Mary Oates ◽  
Thierry Thomas ◽  
Polyzois Makras ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (24) ◽  
pp. 5961
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Inose ◽  
Tsuyoshi Kato ◽  
Shinichi Shirasawa ◽  
Shinji Takahashi ◽  
Masatoshi Hoshino ◽  
...  

To date, it is still unclear how fresh osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) affect the patient’s quality of life and low back pain during a follow-up period of more than 1 year. In the previous trial, women with fresh OVF were randomized to rigid or soft brace for 12 weeks, then both groups were followed for the subsequent 48 weeks. In women completing this trial at our affiliated hospitals, we conducted a follow-up study to investigate the long-term course of an acute vertebral fracture in terms of pain and quality of life. When comparing visual analog scale scores for low back pain and European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions Questionnaire scores between consecutive time points, a significant difference was found between 0 and 12 weeks, but not between 12 and 48 weeks or between 48 weeks and final follow-up. A total 25% had residual low back pain at the final follow-up. A stepwise logistic regression analysis identified age and previous vertebral fracture as predictors of residual low back pain at the final follow-up. Therefore, the degree of low back pain and impairment of the quality of life improved by 12 weeks after injury and did not change thereafter until a mean follow-up of 5.3 years.


Author(s):  
Deborah Cosentini ◽  
Salvatore Grisanti ◽  
Julien Hadoux ◽  
Rossella Libè ◽  
Michele Frigerio ◽  
...  

Abstract Context patients with adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) are frequently on mitotane therapy for a long-time period. The drug exerts an adrenolytic activity requiring glucocorticoid supplementation, which can be potentially detrimental for bone. Objectives to explore whether mitotane plus/minus chemotherapy is associated with an increased proportion of morphometric vertebral fractures (VFs) in ACC patients. Secondary objectives were: proportion of patients with VF progression, or worsening of the spinal deformity index (SDI) during mitotane therapy; predictive factors of VF progression and prognostic role of VF progression. Design and setting multicenter, retrospective cohort study of patients with ACC who received mitotane alone or in association to chemotherapy, recruited from January 2010 to January 2020 in two reference centers in Italy and France. Results a significant increase in the frequency of VFs before and after mitotane therapy was seen both in Italian (28.3% vs 47.8%, p: 0.04) and French (17.8% vs 35.6%, p 0.04) series. VF progression was observed in 39.1%, and 28.9% of patients, respectively. Baseline VFs and increased patient body mass index, but not the dose of cortisol supplementation, showed an independent association with VF progression at multivariate analysis. Among the 72 advanced ACC patients, progression of VFs was associated with a poorer survival. Conclusions the administration of mitotane plus/minus chemotherapy in ACC patients impairs bone health independently from cortisol supplementation. Appropriate preventive measures to decrease the fracture risk should be implemented in these patients.


BJR|Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shane W. Davy ◽  
Diane Bergin

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures (VF) are the most common type of osteoporotic fracture. Patients with VF are at increased risk of hip fractures or additional VFs, both of which contribute to patient morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis of VFs is essential so patients can be prescribed appropriate medical therapy. Most patients with clinical suspicion for VF have an X-ray of the spine. Many VFs are invisible on X-ray and require further imaging. CT can provide excellent bony detail but uses high doses of ionising radiation. MRI provides excellent soft tissue detail and can distinguish old from new fractures in addition to differentiating osteoporotic VFs from other causes of back pain. Bone scans have a limited role due to poor specificity. The literature suggests that radiologists frequently miss or do not report VFs when imaging is requested for an alternative clinical indication and when there is no clinical suspicion of VF. Common examples include failure to identify VFs on lateral chest x-rays, sagittal reformats of CT thorax and abdomen, lateral localizers on MRI and scout views on CT. Failure to diagnose a VF is a missed opportunity to improve management of osteoporosis and reduce risk of further fractures. This article discusses the role of radiographs, CT, MRI and Bone Scintigraphy in the assessment and recognition of osteoporotic fractures. This article focuses on opportunistic diagnosis of vertebral fractures on imaging studies that are performed for other clinical indications. It does not discuss use of DXA which is a specific imaging modality for osteoporosis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document