scholarly journals A novel application of small area estimation in loblolly pine forest inventory

2019 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 444-457
Author(s):  
P Corey Green ◽  
Harold E Burkhart ◽  
John W Coulston ◽  
Philip J Radtke

Abstract Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) is one of the most widely planted tree species globally. As the reliability of estimating forest characteristics such as volume, biomass and carbon becomes more important, the necessary resources available for assessment are often insufficient to meet desired confidence levels. Small area estimation (SAE) methods were investigated for their potential to improve the precision of volume estimates in loblolly pine plantations aged 9–43. Area-level SAE models that included lidar height percentiles and stand thinning status as auxiliary information were developed to test whether precision gains could be achieved. Models that utilized both forms of auxiliary data provided larger gains in precision compared to using lidar alone. Unit-level SAE models were found to offer additional gains compared with area-level models in some cases; however, area-level models that incorporated both lidar and thinning status performed nearly as well or better. Despite their potential gains in precision, unit-level models are more difficult to apply in practice due to the need for highly accurate, spatially defined sample units and the inability to incorporate certain area-level covariates. The results of this study are of interest to those looking to reduce the uncertainty of stand parameter estimates. With improved estimate precision, managers, stakeholders and policy makers can have more confidence in resource assessments for informed decisions.

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. e0189401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Mauro ◽  
Vicente J. Monleon ◽  
Hailemariam Temesgen ◽  
Kevin R. Ford

2020 ◽  
Vol 93 (5) ◽  
pp. 685-693
Author(s):  
P Corey Green ◽  
Harold E Burkhart ◽  
John W Coulston ◽  
Philip J Radtke ◽  
Valerie A Thomas

Abstract In forest inventory, traditional ground-based resource assessments are often expensive and time-consuming forcing managers to reduce sample sizes to meet budgetary and logistical constraints. Small area estimation (SAE) is a class of statistical estimators that uses a combination of traditional survey data and linearly related auxiliary information to improve estimate precision. These techniques have been shown to improve the precision of stand-level inventory estimates in loblolly pine plantations using lidar height percentiles and thinning status as covariates. In this study, the effects of reduced lidar point-cloud densities and lower digital elevation model (DEM) spatial resolutions were investigated for total planted volume estimates using area-level SAE models. In the managed Piedmont pine plantation conditions evaluated, lower lidar point-cloud densities and DEM spatial resolutions were found to have minimal effects on estimates and precision. The results of this study are promising to those interested in incorporating SAE methods into forest inventory programs.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minh Cong Nguyen ◽  
Paul Corral ◽  
Joao Pedro Azevedo ◽  
Qinghua Zhao

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 543-555
Author(s):  
Orietta Luzi ◽  
Fabrizio Solari ◽  
Fabiana Rocci

Abstract The Frame SBS is a statistical register which has been developed at the Italian National Statistical Institute to support the annual estimation of structural business statistics (SBS). Actually, a number of core SBS are estimated by combining microdata directly supplied by different administrative sources. In this context, more accurate estimates for those SBS that are not covered by administrative sources can be obtained through small area estimation (SAE). In this article, we illustrate an application of SAE methods in the framework of the Frame SBS register in order to assess the potential advantages that can be achieved in terms of increased quality and reliability of the target variables. Different types of auxiliary information and approaches are compared in order to identify the optimal estimation strategy in terms of precision of the estimates.


OALib ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 08 (04) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
James Karangwa ◽  
Anshu Bharadwaj

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 397-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis-Paul Rivest ◽  
François Verret ◽  
Sophie Baillargeon

2018 ◽  
Vol 212 ◽  
pp. 199-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Breidenbach ◽  
Steen Magnussen ◽  
Johannes Rahlf ◽  
Rasmus Astrup

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document