Review. A literary history of France. The Middle Ages. Fox, J.

1975 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-177
Author(s):  
W. G. VAN EMDEN
1973 ◽  
Vol 57 (7) ◽  
pp. 377
Author(s):  
Ines Dolz Henry ◽  
A. D. Deyermond ◽  
R. O. Jones

1972 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 670
Author(s):  
Derek W. Lomax ◽  
A. D. Deyermond

1976 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 205
Author(s):  
Guy Mermier ◽  
John Fox

Hispania ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 370
Author(s):  
Steven Hess ◽  
A. D. Deyermond

1977 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 169
Author(s):  
Nicholas Mann ◽  
John Fox

2021 ◽  
Vol 82 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-175
Author(s):  
Daniel Davies

Abstract Scholars often claim that medieval writers use Britain and England interchangeably, but Britain was a contested term throughout the period. One persistent issue was how Scotland fit within Anglocentric visions of the island it shared with England and Wales. This article traces imperialist geography in English historiography via the descriptio Britanniae (description of Britain), a trope found across the Middle Ages, and the fourteenth-century Gough Map, the first sheet-map of Britain. Scottish historians rebut the claims of their Anglocentric counterparts and demonstrate their incomplete knowledge, which they zealously supplement by inventorying Scotland’s natural abundance. In particular, the article concentrates on the remarkable celebration of Scotland’s marine life in Walter Bower’s Scotichronicon (ca. 1447). Attending to the long history of these debates both reveals and counteracts the Anglocentrism of insular literary history.


PMLA ◽  
1915 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-194
Author(s):  
Ronald S. Crane

Among the questions which still await investigation in the literary history of sixteenth and seventeenth century England, not the least important is that of the survival of the vernacular writings of the Middle Ages. No one can have studied the records of publishing activities during the Tudor and Stuart periods without becoming aware that a considerable number of the romances, tales, poems, chronicles, lives of saints of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries still continued to circulate, and to find, though probably in ever smaller numbers, appreciative readers. Nor can anyone who has noted this persistence of medieval literature beyond the Middle Ages fail to draw from it inferences not a little damaging to our current conceptions of sixteenth and seventeenth century taste. As yet, however, no historian of literature has dealt with the problem in a systematic or detailed way—no one has tried to set clearly before us precisely which works, out of the total body of medieval writings, remained in vogue, how long the popularity of each of them lasted, how far they were modified in form or content to suit the taste of successive generations, by what sort of “public” they were read, and of what nature was the influence which they exercised upon the newer writers. Some day perhaps we shall have such a history of the survival of medieval literature in early modern England. In the meantime, as a preliminary treatment of a single phase of the subject, the present study of Guy of Warwick may not be without its interest. It proposes to trace from the days of the early printers to the close of the eighteenth century the fortunes of but one—though perhaps the most typical one—of the many romances whose popularity survived the Middle Ages.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document