Classification of Injurious Fall Severity in Hospitalized Adults

2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (10) ◽  
pp. e138-e144
Author(s):  
Zoe Burns ◽  
Srijesa Khasnabish ◽  
Ann C Hurley ◽  
Mary Ellen Lindros ◽  
Diane L Carroll ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Many hospital systems in the United States report injurious inpatient falls using the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators categories: None, Minor, Moderate, Major, and Death. The Major category is imprecise, including injuries ranging from a wrist fracture to potentially fatal subdural hematoma. The purpose of this project was to refine the Major injury classification to derive a valid and reliable categorization of the types and severities of Major inpatient fall-related injuries. Methods Based on published literature and ranking of injurious fall incident reports (n = 85) from a large Academic Medical Center, we divided the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators Major category into three subcategories: Major A—injuries that caused temporary functional impairment (eg, wrist fracture), major facial injury without internal injury (eg, nasal bone fracture), or disruption of a surgical wound; Major B—injuries that caused long-term functional impairment or had the potential risk of increased mortality (eg, multiple rib fractures); and Major C—injuries that had a well-established risk of mortality (eg, hip fracture). Based on the literature and expert opinion, our research team reached consensus on an administration manual to promote accurate classification of Major injuries into one of the three subcategories. Results The team tested and validated each of the categories which resulted in excellent interrater reliability (kappa = .96). Of the Major injuries, the distribution of Major A, B, and C was 40.3%, 16.1%, and 43.6%, respectively. Conclusions These subcategories enhance the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators categorization. Using the administration manual, trained personnel can classify injurious fall severity with excellent reliability.

2021 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. e021209
Author(s):  
Flavia Aparecida Dias Marmo ◽  
Zenewton André da Silva Gama ◽  
Darlene Mara dos Santos Tavares

Introdução: Os indicadores de qualidades são aspectos importantes na gestão dos serviços. No entanto, na atenção primária, há escassez de indicadores especificamente no que concerne à população idosa. Objetivo: Construir e validar indicadores de processo da qualidade da assistência de enfermagem ao idoso. Métodos: Trata-se de uma pesquisa metodológica, sendo as etapas baseadas nas propostas da National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators e da Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Os indicadores foram avaliados segundo os critérios de: validade de face, terminologia, necessidade, validade de conteúdo, confiabilidade, viabilidade, utilidade e usabilidade. Participaram do painel de especialistas nove enfermeiros sendo profissionais que prestavam assistência na atenção primária, pesquisadores na área de atenção à saúde do idoso e membros de organizações brasileiras relacionadas à saúde. Foi utilizado o Método de Adequação desenvolvido pela Research and Development da University of California Los Angeles. Os dados foram analisados por meio da mediana, Índice de Validade de Conteúdo e Kappa. Resultados: Foram validados 22 indicadores. Todas as medidas foram consideradas apropriadas, com validade de conteúdo e obtiveram acordo acerca da terminologia e necessidade. Dentre os 22 indicadores, apenas quatro foram avaliados como não disponíveis e não viáveis para serem coletados. Treze indicadores não foram considerados úteis para determinar o recebimento de incentivos financeiros. Na avaliação sobre a usabilidade para comparar os relatórios públicos, seis indicadores obtiveram pontuação relativamente baixa. Conclusão: Os indicadores podem contribuir para o monitoramento da qualidade da assistência ao idoso, identificando oportunidades de melhoria nas ações realizadas pelo enfermeiro na atenção primária.  


2021 ◽  
pp. 019394592199960
Author(s):  
Thomas Koehler ◽  
Danielle Olds

There are many studies about nurses’ intention to leave their jobs and contributing factors. However, there is a lack of research about generational differences in nurses’ intention to leave. This evidence may help with workforce planning and targeting specific generations of nurses with retention interventions. Using the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators 2018 Annual Registered Nurse Survey, we used descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression to examine the prevalence of and reasons for nurses’ intention to leave in the next year by generational age group. Our sample included 207,636 hospital nurses from across the United States. We found that 21% of nurses ( n = 44,082) reported intention to leave. When comparing generations, there were differences in intention to leave, as well as differences in potentially preventable, career advancement, and personal intention to leave reasons. Workload/staffing was a common reason across generations, indicating that certain interventions may be applicable regardless of generation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 82-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Merkley ◽  
Nely Amaral ◽  
Maya Sinno ◽  
Tanaz Jivraj ◽  
William Mundle ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Lisa Groff Paris ◽  
Mary Terhaar

The strongest predictor of nurse job dissatisfaction and intent to leave is that of stress in the practice environment. Good communication, control over practice, decision making at the bedside, teamwork, and nurse empowerment have been found to increase nurse satisfaction and decrease turnover. In this article we share our experience of developing a rapid-design process to change the approach to performance improvement so as to increase engagement, empowerment, effectiveness, and the quality of the professional practice environment. Meal and non-meal breaks were identified as the target area for improvement. Qualitative and quantitative data support the success of this project. We begin this article with a review of literature related to work environment and retention and a presentation of the frameworks used to improve the work environment, specifically Maslow’s theory of the Hierarchy of Inborn Needs and the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators™ Survey. We then describe our performance improvement project and share our conclusion and recommendations.


2009 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 252-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Bergquist-Beringer ◽  
Jan Davidson ◽  
Carolyn Agosto ◽  
Norma K. Linde ◽  
Marla Abel ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document