scholarly journals Dementia and Transitioning From Assisted Living to Memory Care Units: Perspectives of Administrators in Three Facility Types

2009 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 192-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. G. Kelsey ◽  
S. B. Laditka ◽  
J. N. Laditka
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 21-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phyllis M. Gaspar ◽  
Cindy A. Scherb ◽  
Felix Rivera-Mariani

2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (5) ◽  
pp. 878-884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitchell Roberts ◽  
Lindsay J Peterson ◽  
Kathryn Hyer

Abstract Background and Objectives Assisted living (AL) is a growing sector of the U.S. long-term care market, with its development driven largely by private market choices. However, consumers need information to choose the right AL community (ALC). This paper examined information available on U.S. state websites concerning ALC quality, costs, and services. Research Design and Methods Based on prior research and their analysis of a sample of state websites, researchers identified 39 key informational elements and grouped them into four categories, (a) ALC characteristics, (b) payment and services, (c) quality, and (d) website usability. Researchers then examined the presence of the 39 elements on 51 websites (U.S. states and the District of Columbia), meeting regularly to discuss findings and resolve differences. Results A majority of states provided basic information about individual ALCs (e.g., number of beds, ownership). Only 35% listed payment(s) accepted (e.g., Medicaid), and 31% indicated the availability of memory care. Nearly 70% posted inspection results, while only 43% provided information about complaints. Many met basic usability guidelines (e.g., type size), but locating content on many sites required multiple steps, and none met 5th-grade-or-below readability standards. Discussion and Implications A majority of websites provided important information, such as inspection results. However, many were lacking key elements concerning payment accepted and services. Finding what was available was burdensome. More work is needed to help states provide information that enables consumers to find ALCs that meet their needs. The lack of such information puts older adults at risk of inappropriate placements.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S545-S546
Author(s):  
Portia Y Cornell ◽  
Momotazur Rahman ◽  
Wenhan Zhang ◽  
Kali Thomas

Abstract The objective of this study is to estimate the effect of receiving care in a dementia-care licensed (DCL) assisted living community, versus a standard AL, on outcomes of residents with ADRD. In four states that issue a license for specialized dementia care (AL, CO, MS, and NY), we identify a cohort of 5,720 Medicare fee-for-services beneficiaries with ADRD who moved to an AL in 2014. To control for unobserved factors that contribute to a patient’s selection of AL type, we use the difference in the log-distances from an individual’s home address to the nearest DCL and standard AL as an instrumental variable. We will report the effect of residence in a DCL AL on mortality, inpatient hospital days, emergency department utilization, and hospice use, showing how the use the distance instrument offers differing estimates from unadjusted or multiple-regression methods.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 962-962
Author(s):  
Christin Wolf ◽  
Andrea Freidus ◽  
Dena Shenk

Abstract Our study draws from the narratives of 30 staff caring for residents in congregate care communities in central North Carolina from June-September 2020. It is part of phase 2 of an on-going 3-phase rapid qualitative appraisal of workers providing longterm care to older adults with the purpose of disseminating findings to key stakeholders to inform policy, programming, and funding decisions. The 3-phase project involves semi-structured interviews with 60+ participants that were videorecorded using a web-based platform. We report on the emotional and visceral experiences of these direct care workers providing care during the pandemic. We organize the data into four affect categories: fear/anxiety, sadness/grief, anger/frustration, and trauma/stress. The 30 participants include nurses, activities staff, med techs, CNAs, housekeepers, dining staff, chaplains and administrators at nursing homes, assisted living communities, memory care units and continuing care retirement communities. We amplify the voices of these formal caregivers in order to demonstrate how their sensorial and emotive experiences can speak to the human suffering they bore witness to, the underlying ageism that permeates our culture, and the social hierarchy that devalues their labor and their worth as they serve on the frontlines during this unprecedented global pandemic.


2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 255-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan G. Kelsey ◽  
Sarah B. Laditka ◽  
James N. Laditka
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document