scholarly journals Bayesian joint inversion of controlled source electromagnetic and magnetotelluric data to image freshwater aquifer offshore New Jersey

2019 ◽  
Vol 218 (3) ◽  
pp. 1822-1837 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Blatter ◽  
Kerry Key ◽  
Anandaroop Ray ◽  
Chloe Gustafson ◽  
Rob Evans

SUMMARY Joint inversion of multiple electromagnetic data sets, such as controlled source electromagnetic and magnetotelluric data, has the potential to significantly reduce uncertainty in the inverted electrical resistivity when the two data sets contain complementary information about the subsurface. However, evaluating quantitatively the model uncertainty reduction is made difficult by the fact that conventional inversion methods—using gradients and model regularization—typically produce just one model, with no associated estimate of model parameter uncertainty. Bayesian inverse methods can provide quantitative estimates of inverted model parameter uncertainty by generating an ensemble of models, sampled proportional to data fit. The resulting posterior distribution represents a combination of a priori assumptions about the model parameters and information contained in field data. Bayesian inversion is therefore able to quantify the impact of jointly inverting multiple data sets by using the statistical information contained in the posterior distribution. We illustrate, for synthetic data generated from a simple 1-D model, the shape of parameter space compatible with controlled source electromagnetic and magnetotelluric data, separately and jointly. We also demonstrate that when data sets contain complementary information about the model, the region of parameter space compatible with the joint data set is less than or equal to the intersection of the regions compatible with the individual data sets. We adapt a trans-dimensional Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm for jointly inverting multiple electromagnetic data sets for 1-D earth models and apply it to surface-towed controlled source electromagnetic and magnetotelluric data collected offshore New Jersey, USA, to evaluate the extent of a low salinity aquifer within the continental shelf. Our inversion results identify a region of high resistivity of varying depth and thickness in the upper 500 m of the continental shelf, corroborating results from a previous study that used regularized, gradient-based inversion methods. We evaluate the joint model parameter uncertainty in comparison to the uncertainty obtained from the individual data sets and demonstrate quantitatively that joint inversion offers reduced uncertainty. In addition, we show how the Bayesian model ensemble can subsequently be used to derive uncertainty estimates of pore water salinity within the low salinity aquifer.

Geophysics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 492-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiyi Zhang ◽  
Partha S. Routh ◽  
Douglas W. Oldenburg ◽  
David L. Alumbaugh ◽  
Gregory A. Newman

Inversions of electromagnetic data from different coil configurations provide independent information about geological structures. We develop a 1-D inversion algorithm that can invert data from the horizontal coplanar (HC), vertical coplanar, coaxial (CA), and perpendicular coil configurations separately or jointly. The inverse problem is solved by minimizing a model objective function subject to data constraints. Tests using synthetic data from 1-D models indicate that if data are collected at a sufficient number of frequencies, then the recovered models from individual inversions of different coil systems can be quite similar. However, if only a limited number of frequencies are available, then joint inversion of data from different coils produces a better model than the individual inversions. Tests on 3-D synthetic data sets indicate that 1-D inversions can be used as a fast and approximate tool to locate anomalies in the subsurface. Also for the test example presented here, the joint inversion of HC and CA data over a 3-D conductivity provided a better model than that produced by the individual inversion of the data sets.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugénie S. Euskirchen ◽  
Shawn P. Serbin ◽  
Tobey B. Carman ◽  
Jennifer M. Fraterrigo ◽  
Hélène Genet ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 414-433
Author(s):  
Yunxia Han ◽  
Yizhong Ma ◽  
Linhan Ouyang ◽  
Jianjun Wang ◽  
Yiliu Tu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document