12. Responding to a Claim

2020 ◽  
pp. 128-132
Author(s):  
Stuart Sime
Keyword(s):  
Case Management ◽  
Management System ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Default Judgment ◽  
Allocation Decisions

This chapter discusses the procedure for defendants responding to the claim. A defendant who intends to contest proceedings must respond to the claim by filing an acknowledgment of service and/or by filing a defence. Defended claims become subject to the court’s case management system, with the court making provisional track allocation decisions, followed by the parties filing directions questionnaires. If a defendant fails to make any response to a claim a default judgment is usually entered within a relatively short period after service.

12. Responding to a claim

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart Sime
Keyword(s):  
Case Management ◽  
Management System ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Default Judgment ◽  
Allocation Decisions

This chapter discusses the procedure for defendants responding to the claim. A defendant who intends to contest proceedings must respond to the claim by filing an acknowledgment of service and/or by filing a defence. Defended claims become subject to the court’s case management system, with the court making provisional track allocation decisions, followed by the parties filing directions questionnaires. If a defendant fails to make any response to a claim a default judgment is usually entered within a relatively short period after service.

12. Responding to a claim

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart Sime
Keyword(s):  
Case Management ◽  
Management System ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Default Judgment ◽  
Allocation Decisions

This chapter discusses the procedure for defendants responding to the claim. A defendant who intends to contest proceedings must respond to the claim by filing an acknowledgment of service and/or by filing a defence. Defended claims become subject to the court’s case management system, with the court making provisional track allocation decisions, followed by the parties filing directions questionnaires. If a defendant fails to make any response to a claim a default judgment is usually entered within a relatively short period after service.

12. Responding to a Claim

2021 ◽  
pp. 129-133
Author(s):  
Stuart Sime
Keyword(s):  
Case Management ◽  
Management System ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Default Judgment ◽  
Allocation Decisions

This chapter discusses the procedure for defendants responding to the claim. A defendant who intends to contest proceedings must respond to the claim by filing an acknowledgment of service and/or by filing a defence. Defended claims become subject to the court’s case management system, with the court making provisional track allocation decisions, followed by the parties filing directions questionnaires. If a defendant fails to make any response to a claim a default judgment is usually entered within a relatively short period after service.

12. Responding to a Claim

2019 ◽  
pp. 132-136
Author(s):  
Stuart Sime
Keyword(s):  
Case Management ◽  
Management System ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Default Judgment ◽  
Allocation Decisions

This chapter discusses the procedure for defendants responding to the claim. A defendant who intends to contest proceedings must respond to the claim by filing an acknowledgment of service and/or by filing a defence. Defended claims become subject to the court’s case management system, with the court making provisional track allocation decisions, followed by the parties filing directions questionnaires. If a defendant fails to make any response to a claim a default judgment is usually entered within a relatively short period after service.

12. Responding to a Claim

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart Sime
Keyword(s):  
Case Management ◽  
Management System ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Default Judgment ◽  
Allocation Decisions

This chapter discusses the procedure for defendants responding to the claim. A defendant who intends to contest proceedings must respond to the claim by filing an acknowledgment of service and/or by filing a defence. Defended claims become subject to the court’s case management system, with the court making provisional track allocation decisions, followed by the parties filing directions questionnaires. If a defendant fails to make any response to a claim a default judgment is usually entered within a relatively short period after service.

Modified Mnet for Performance Improvement in Moodle Learning Management System

2015 ◽  
Vol 764-765 ◽  
pp. 1351-1355
Author(s):  
Jin Long Wang ◽  
Shu Ju Chueh ◽  
Wen Chu Kuo ◽  
Yi Ying Lin
Keyword(s):  
Load Balancing ◽  
Performance Improvement ◽  
Management System ◽  
Learning Management System ◽  
System Stability ◽  
System Model ◽  
Front End ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Learning Management ◽  
Database Servers

Moodle is one of the most popular Learning Management System (LMS) in the world. However, this kind of system always suffer the burden of large amount of user connections in a short period of time, such that the front end web servers and the rear end database servers became the bottleneck of the whole system. In the LMS system, the most challenges are to provide the rapid response, the system stability, the system flexibility, the system scalability, and the fault tolerance. Currently, the problems of system overloading are solved by the load balancing scheme, which still have a lot of limitations. In this paper, the proposed scheme, based on the load balancing scheme, combines the mercy of Moodle network scheme and the separate of database in order to improve the performance both on the level of systems and applications for the situation of large amount users. From the performance evaluation, the proposed scheme is superior to the existing system model.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document