Fistula Healing Is Low After Fecal Diversion Surgery in Perianal Crohn’s Disease

Author(s):  
Sheeva Johnson ◽  
Jeffrey Ko ◽  
Wissam J Halabi ◽  
Jesse Stondell ◽  
Maneesh Dave
2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (6) ◽  
pp. S-728
Author(s):  
Jacqueline Reid ◽  
Colin B. Rumbolt ◽  
Robert A. Mitchell ◽  
Cherry Galorport ◽  
Jacqueline Brown ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rudolf Mennigen ◽  
Britta Heptner ◽  
Norbert Senninger ◽  
Emile Rijcken

Aim. To evaluate the results of temporary fecal diversion in colorectal and perianal Crohn’s disease.Method. We retrospectively identified 29 consecutive patients (14 females, 15 males; median age: 30.0 years, range: 18–76) undergoing temporary fecal diversion for colorectal (n=14), ileal (n=4), and/or perianal Crohn’s disease (n=22). Follow-up was in median 33.0 (3–103) months. Response to fecal diversion, rate of stoma reversal, and relapse rate after stoma reversal were recorded.Results. The response to temporary fecal diversion was complete remission in 4/29 (13.8%), partial remission in 12/29 (41.4%), no change in 7/29 (24.1%), and progress in 6/29 (20.7%). Stoma reversal was performed in 19 out of 25 patients (76%) available for follow-up. Of these, the majority (15/19, 78.9%) needed further surgical therapies for a relapse of the same pathology previously leading to temporary fecal diversion, including colorectal resections (10/19, 52.6%) and creation of a definitive stoma (7/19, 36.8%). At the end of follow-up, only 4/25 patients (16%) had a stable course without the need for further definitive surgery.Conclusion. Temporary fecal diversion can induce remission in otherwise refractory colorectal or perianal Crohn’s disease, but the chance of enduring remission after stoma reversal is low.


2000 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 1258-1263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takayuki Yamamoto ◽  
Robert N. Allan ◽  
Michael R.B. Keighley

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S490-S491
Author(s):  
B GU ◽  
K Venkatesh ◽  
A J Williams ◽  
W Ng ◽  
C Corte ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Anti-TNF α agents, including infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADA), are arguably the most effective medical therapies for fistulising perianal Crohn’s disease (CD). Increased rates of perianal fistula healing have been reported with increased IFX trough levels. Our study aimed to determine the correlation between perianal fistula healing and closure with IFX and ADA trough levels in fistulising perianal CD patients on maintenance therapy. Methods In this multi-centre retrospective cross-sectional study, we identified CD patients with perianal fistulae on maintenance IFX or ADA who had an IFX or ADA trough level within 3 months of clinical assessment. Data collected included demographics, serum IFX and ADA trough levels (mg/l) and concomitant medical and surgical therapy. The primary outcome was fistula healing, defined as a cessation in fistula drainage. The secondary outcome was fistula closure, defined as healing as well as closure of all external fistula openings. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to identify the IFX and ADA concentration cut-off points with combined maximal sensitivity and specificity that corresponded to fistula healing. Results A total of 123 patients (IFX = 72; ADA = 51) were included. Fifty-four (75.0%) patients on maintenance IFX achieved fistula healing and 22 (30.6%) achieved fistula closure. Patients who achieved fistula healing had significantly higher median IFX trough levels compared with patients who did not [6.2 (interquartile range 3.1 - 9.6) vs. 3.0 (0.3 - 6.2), (p = 0.007)]. The median IFX trough levels for patients with and without fistula closure were not significantly different [6.4 (2.9 - 9.8) vs. 4.9 (2.5 - 8.9), (p = 0.277)]. Forty (78.4%) patients on maintenance ADA achieved fistula healing and eighteen (35.3%) fistula closure. Patients who achieved fistula healing had a significantly higher median ADA level compared with those who did not [8.7 (6.6 - 12.0) vs. 5.4 (2.5 - 8.3), p = 0.007]. The median ADA trough levels for patients with fistula closure and without fistula closure were not significantly different [9.6 (6.7 – 12.0) vs. 7.7 (4.4–9.8), p = 0.098]. An IFX cut off point of 6.10mg/l was associated with healing (sensitivity 52%; specificity 78%; area under the curve (AUC) 0.72). An ADA cut off point of 7.05mg/l was associated with healing (sensitivity 70%; specificity 73%; AUC 0.77). Conclusion Higher IFX and ADA trough levels are associated with fistula healing. No association between IFX and ADA trough levels and fistula closure was seen, although larger numbers may be required. To the best our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate a significant association with both higher IFX and ADA levels with fistula healing in perianal CD.


2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (8) ◽  
pp. 2079-2086 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea C. Bafford ◽  
Anastasiya Latushko ◽  
Natasha Hansraj ◽  
Guruprasad Jambaulikar ◽  
Leyla J. Ghazi

2007 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 529-537 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. H. Mueller ◽  
M. Geis ◽  
J. Glatzle ◽  
M. Kasparek ◽  
T. Meile ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document