scholarly journals Liquid Chromatographic Determination of Mebendazole and its Metabolites, Aminomebendazole and Hydroxymebendazole, in Eel Muscle Tissue

1996 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 645-651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christiaan A J Hajee ◽  
Nel Haagsma

Abstract An analytical method is presented for liquid chromatographic (LC) determination of mebendazole (MBZ), hydroxymebendazole (MBZ-OH), and aminomebendazole (MBZ-NH2) in eel muscle tissue. Muscle tissue is extracted with ethyl acetate at pH 7.5. After addition of n-hexane, the extract is cleaned up and concentrated on an aminopropyl solid-phase extraction column. The test solutions are analyzed isocratically on a ChromSpher B LC column with acetonitrile–phosphate buffer, pH 6.2, as mobile phase. Limits of detection and quantitation were 0.7 and 1.1 ¼g/kg, respectively, for MBZOH; 1.4 and 2.3 ¼g/kg, respectively, for MBZ; and 1.5 and 2.1 ¼g/kg, respectively, for MBZ-NH2. Interand intraday coefficients of variation were 3.5 and 3.4%, respectively, for MBZ-OH; 2.5 and 3.1%, respectively, for MBZ; and 5.8 and 4.8%, respectively, for MBZ-NH2. Mean recoveries were 90% for MBZ, 74% for MBZ-NH2, and 92% for MBZ-OH. A linear range of applicability of at least 10–1000 ¼g/kg was found for each analyte. Incurred MBZ-NH2 (181.3 ¼g/kg) was identified in eel muscle tissue apart from MBZ (23.7 ¼g/kg) after 48 h exposure ina treatment bath containing MBZ at 1 mg/L.

1998 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 869-872 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen J Doherty ◽  
Allen Fox ◽  
David W Fink

Abstract An analytical method for determining ivermectin in feed at 0.50- 3 ppm is presented. The method is based on liquid chromatographic measurement after sample preparation by adsorption chromatography on alumina and solid-phase extraction. Two complete, final, finished medicated feeds and the corresponding control feeds used in their preparation were analyzed. Recoveries from feeds fortified at 50-150% of the 2 ppm ivermectin use concentration also were determined. Mean recoveries from replicate analyses ranged from 90 to 100%, and coefficients of variation (CVs) were less than 4.5%. No significant interferences were found in control feeds. The pooled distribution of individual analytical results (n = 100) gave a mean recovery of 100%, a recovery range of 90-111%, and an overall CV of 5.5%. Resolution of the total variance into its 2 components gave a withinlaboratory CV of 4.1% and a between-laboratory CV of 3.4%. There was no significant difference in recoveries among laboratories, days, concentrations, and feed base or between fortified and medicated feeds (P > 0.2)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document