Agency at the Managerial Interface: Public Sector Reform as Institutional Work

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 259-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Cloutier ◽  
Jean-Louis Denis ◽  
Ann Langley ◽  
Lise Lamothe

This article draws on recent developments in institutional theory to better understand the managerial efforts implicated in the implementation of government-led reforms in public sector services. Based on a longitudinal study of a massive reform effort aimed at transforming the province of Quebec’s publicly-funded healthcare system, the article applies the notion of institutional work to understand how managers responsible for newly formed healthcare organizations defined and carried out their individual missions while simultaneously clarifying and operationalizing the government’s reform mandate. We identify and describe the properties of four types of work implicated in this process and suggest that structural work, conceptual work, and operational work need to be underpinned by relational work to offer chances for successful policy reform. By showing the specific processes whereby top-down reform initiatives are taken up by managers and hybridized with existing institutionalized forms and practices, this article helps us better understand both the importance of managerial agency in enacting reform, and the dynamics that lead to policy slippage in complex reform contexts.

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 317-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Pugh ◽  
John Connolly

This article reviews recent linked challenges to Scottish Local Government viewed through the lens of ‘governance’ in the post-Scottish independence referendum context. This is an appropriate juncture to consider the range of contemporaneous and linked issues and challenges that face this level of governance. The article includes an update on the debates associated public sector reform and the agenda to ‘renew local democracy’. Moreover, the article addresses recent developments with regards to empowerment as a result of the Community Empowerment Act (passed in June 2015). The article concludes by providing an update on the challenges associated with the democratic representation of Scottish local authorities. By drawing these themes and developments together, highlighting their historical roots, the article provides an important platform for a new research agenda in relation to local democracy and community empowerment in Scotland.


2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanwei Hu

AbstractRecent developments of politeness research mainly consist of the study of politeness within a broader framework of relationship or relating and the re-conceptualization of politeness as an evaluative judgement made by participants on the basis of norms and expectations. This article hopes to contribute to the study of relating by probing into the normative basis of relational work. Addressing the relational aspect of communication, Habermas’ (1979) concept of normative rightness claim highlights the normative commitment of the speaker in doing (more than judging) relational work, which has been obscured by the focus on (hearers’) judgements in current research on relational work. Habermas’ concept brings into focus the fact that participants in interaction can define and redefine their relationship through contesting the other’s normative rightness claim or the normative background thereby evoked. This dynamic process of negotiating relationships through negotiating norms can be further explicated by drawing on Culpeper’s (2008) and Kádár and Haugh’s (2013) differentiations of norms. The article explores the usefulness of such differentiations by analyzing different cases of norm variation which can be seen to underlie relational work dispute.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document