Adaptive and Network Sampling for Inference and Interventions in Changing Populations

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Steven K Thompson

Abstract In this paper, I discuss some of the wider uses of adaptive and network sampling designs. Three uses of sampling designs are to select units from a population to make inferences about population values, to select units to use in an experiment, and to distribute interventions to benefit a population. The most useful approaches for inference from adaptively selected samples are design-based methods and Bayesian methods. Adaptive link-tracing network sampling methods are important for sampling populations that are otherwise hard to reach. Sampling in changing populations involves temporal network or spatial sampling design processes with units selected both into and out of the sample over time. Averaging or smoothing fast-moving versions of these designs provides simple estimates of network-related characteristics. The effectiveness of intervention programs to benefit populations depends a great deal on the sampling and assignment designs used in spreading the intervention.

Ecosphere ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. e02540 ◽  
Author(s):  
David T. Barnett ◽  
Paul A. Duffy ◽  
David S. Schimel ◽  
Rachel E. Krauss ◽  
Kathryn M. Irvine ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.C. Bueso ◽  
J.M. Angulo ◽  
G. Qian ◽  
F.J. Alonso

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-69
Author(s):  
Christopher A. Taylor ◽  
Bryan S. Engelbert ◽  
Robert J. DiStefano

Abstract We conducted a study to investigate methods to assess crayfish populations typically found in low gradient, lentic, floodplain habitats in Missouri. We used a random site selection process that allowed us to capture all known species from this region of Missouri. We compared two sampling methods for primary burrowing crayfishes at our sampling sites: hook-and-line capture technique and burrow excavation. Adjacent standing water habitats at sites were also sampled using a timed search method. Hook-and-line capture success was substantially less than reported in the literature (0.7% versus 80%), while burrow excavation was higher than reported (64% versus 40.7%). We successfully captured six crayfish species using burrow excavation, whereas lentic timed search sampling captured nine species in adjacent standing waters at our sampling sites. Our results suggest that additional efforts sampling lentic habitats rather than additional time searching for and excavating burrows is more likely to capture total community richness. We found a seasonal influence on burrow occupancy surveys, as Julian day was positively correlated to finding active crayfish burrows. Crayfish capture in standing water was positively affected by soil temperature, and negatively correlated to Julian day.


2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 667-672
Author(s):  
Sai Tang ◽  
Jianyu Yang ◽  
Yanqing Chen ◽  
Chao Zhang ◽  
Dongling Zhao ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 523-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Angulo ◽  
M. D. Ruiz-Medina ◽  
F. J. Alonso ◽  
M. C. Bueso

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Brey

Learn how to use R to analyze networks that change over time.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document