Commentary: NuNec™ Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Improves Quality of Life in Cervical Radiculopathy and Myelopathy: a 2-Year Follow-up

Neurosurgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 429-429
Author(s):  
Joshua E Meyers ◽  
John Pollina
10.14444/6030 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 221-229
Author(s):  
JAN STULIK ◽  
MARTON RONAI ◽  
BRUNO RUDINSKY ◽  
DANIEL ZARZYCKI ◽  
DARIUSZ LATKA ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (10) ◽  
pp. 2389-2396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingpeng Song ◽  
Da He ◽  
Xiao Han ◽  
Ning Zhang ◽  
Jinchao Wang ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. s-0035-1554286-s-0035-1554286
Author(s):  
Andrew Berg ◽  
Jamie Tankel ◽  
Eanna Ansari ◽  
Maire-Clare Killen ◽  
Miguel Hernandez ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Moran ◽  
C. Bolger

The surgical treatment of cervical spondylosis and resulting cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy has evolved over the past century. Surgical options for dorsal decompression of the cervical spine includes the traditional laminectomy and laminoplasty, first described in Asia in the 1970's. More recently the dorsal approch has been explored in terms of minimally invasive options including foraminotomies for nerve root descompression. Ventral decompression and fusion techniques are also described in the article, including traditional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, strut grafting and cervical disc arthroplasty. Overall, the outcome from surgery is determined by choosing the correct surgery for the correct patient and pathology and this is what we hope to explain in this brief review.


2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 752-759 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng-Yuan Chang ◽  
Hsuan-Kan Chang ◽  
Jau-Ching Wu ◽  
Wen-Cheng Huang ◽  
Li-Yu Fay ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE Several large-scale clinical trials demonstrate the efficacy of 1- and 2-level cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) for degenerative disc disease (DDD) in the subaxial cervical spine, while other studies reveal that during physiological neck flexion, the C4–5 and C5–6 discs account for more motion than the C3–4 level, causing more DDD. This study aimed to compare the results of CDA at different levels. METHODS After a review of the medical records, 94 consecutive patients who underwent single-level CDA were divided into the C3–4 and non-C3–4 CDA groups (i.e., those including C4–5, C5–6, and C6–7). Clinical outcomes were measured using the visual analog scale for neck and arm pain and by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores. Postoperative range of motion (ROM) and heterotopic ossification (HO) were determined by radiography and CT, respectively. RESULTS Eighty-eight patients (93.6%; mean age 45.62 ± 10.91 years), including 41 (46.6%) female patients, underwent a mean follow-up of 4.90 ± 1.13 years. There were 11 patients in the C3–4 CDA group and 77 in the non-C3–4 CDA group. Both groups had significantly improved clinical outcomes at each time point after the surgery. The mean preoperative (7.75° vs 7.03°; p = 0.58) and postoperative (8.18° vs 8.45°; p = 0.59) ROMs were similar in both groups. The C3–4 CDA group had significantly greater prevalence (90.9% vs 58.44%; p = 0.02) and higher severity grades (2.27 ± 0.3 vs 0.97 ± 0.99; p = 0.0001) of HO. CONCLUSIONS Although CDA at C3–4 was infrequent, the improved clinical outcomes of CDA were similar at C3–4 to that in the other subaxial levels of the cervical spine at the approximately 5-year follow-ups. In this Asian population, who had a propensity to have ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, there was more HO formation in patients who received CDA at the C3–4 level than in other subaxial levels of the cervical spine. While the type of artificial discs could have confounded the issue, future studies with more patients are required to corroborate the phenomenon.


Spine ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 36 (8) ◽  
pp. 639-646 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald M. Y. Quan ◽  
Jean-Marc Vital ◽  
Steve Hansen ◽  
Vincent Pointillart

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (videosuppl1) ◽  
pp. V4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chih-Chang Chang ◽  
Jau-Ching Wu ◽  
Peng-Yuan Chang ◽  
Mei-Yin Yeh ◽  
Yi-Hsuan Kuo ◽  
...  

There are many kinds of artificial discs available for cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA), with various designs of fixation and articulation mechanisms. Each of these designs has different features and theoretically fits most optimally in selected types of patients. However, there has been insufficient literature to guide individualized selection among these CDA devices. Since CDA aims to restore the joint function rather than arthrodesis, tailor-made size, shape, and mechanical properties should be taken into account for each candidate's target disc. Despite several large-scale prospective randomized control trials that have demonstrated the effectiveness and durability of CDA for up to 8 years, none of them involved more than one kind of artificial disc. In this video the authors present detailed steps and technical aspects of the newly introduced ProDisc-C Vivo (DePuy Synthes Spine), which has the same ball-and-socket design for controlled, predictable motion as the ProDisc-C. The newly derived teeth fixation provides high primary stability and multilevel capability by avoidance of previous keel-related limitations and complications (e.g., split vertebral fracture). Please note that the ProDisc-C Vivo is currently not available on the US market.The authors present the case of a 53-year-old woman who had symptoms of both radiculopathy and myelopathy caused by a large, calcified disc herniation at C4–5. There was no improvement after 4 months of medical treatment and rehabilitation. A single-level CDA was successfully performed with the ProDisc-C Vivo, and her symptoms were completely ameliorated afterward. The follow-up images demonstrated preservation of motion at the indexed level.The video can be found here: https://youtu.be/4DSES1xgvQU.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document