Fathers Making Sense of It All

It's a Setup ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 239-278
Author(s):  
Timothy Black ◽  
Sky Keyes

This chapter examines the cultural frames and narratives fathers used to represent themselves, tell a coherent story about their lives, and project an identity of themselves into their futures. It was rare that their frames and narratives conveyed an understanding of the systemic class, racial, and ethnic inequalities and barriers that confront them. More generally, fathers were reactive to moralistic discourses that cast them as irresponsible, unreliable, negligent, deadbeat dads. They attempted to derive socially valued identities along a range of symbolic boundaries that included distinguishing themselves from fathers who relied on welfare, from fathers uninvolved in their children’s lives, and, most of all, from their own irresponsible, absent fathers. They adopted individualistic narratives about taking responsibility, “manning up,” and making fatherhood central to their lives. The men imagined themselves doing better and, in nearly all cases, being engaged fathers was at the center of these projected, hopeful constructions.

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa MB Sølvberg ◽  
Vegard Jarness

In this article, we address the methodological question of making sense of contradictions in sociological analysis. Focusing on the scholarly debate about generating and interpreting data on symbolic boundaries – the ways in which social actors evaluate, categorise and judge others – we argue in favour of the continued relevance of the qualitative interview. We discuss how we can move beyond merely mapping attitudinal stances and deal with inconsistencies and contradictions in interviewees’ accounts when classifying others. Rather than seeing contradictions as reflecting a fundamentally unreliable and invalid method of studying people’s feelings, thoughts and attitudes, we argue that they can be viewed as reflecting existing contradictions that people grapple with in everyday life. To illustrate our methodological points, we conduct a small-scale empirical analysis of bodily distinction and symbolic boundaries among a sample of physically active, upper-class men in Norway. Highlighting tensions between interviewees’ honourable and visceral narratives, our analysis explores how such tensions can be teased out by using certain interviewing techniques. We argue that interviewees’ contradictory accounts are connected to the level of abstraction in the phrasing of interview questions. We thus emphasise the importance of methodological reflexivity in studying symbolic boundaries.


Making Media ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 193-206
Author(s):  
Arne H. Krumsvik ◽  
Stefania Milan ◽  
Niamh Ní Bhroin ◽  
Tanja Storsul
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Alan Stephens ◽  
Nicola Baker
Keyword(s):  

2003 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-183
Author(s):  
Stanley Krippner
Keyword(s):  

1998 ◽  
Vol 43 (12) ◽  
pp. 856-857
Author(s):  
Eric D. Miller ◽  
Kenneth R. Valley
Keyword(s):  

1981 ◽  
Vol 26 (9) ◽  
pp. 695-696
Author(s):  
Emery S. Hetrick
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document