Conclusion

2021 ◽  
pp. 243-246
Author(s):  
Marie Seong-Hak Kim

Legal reforms in early modern France marked a confluence of the crown’s judicial and legislative agenda, aimed at achieving what can be called in modern times judicial economy. They attested to the old-fashioned idea that the law, reinforced by royal authority, afforded better protection for the less-than-mighty subjects. Success in making the kingdom’s laws more systematic and equitable vindicates an important aspect of the meaning that historians and theorists have attached to the idea of a monarchie absolue. Early modern legal history has shown that a robust expression of sovereignty was intrinsically tied with the control of the sources of law. The historical forces behind the French law, long in the making, shed critical light on European legal tradition and jus commune.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Breton

Abstract— This article explores the memory of a traumatic event across several generations. It focuses on the legacy of the Saint Bartholomew’s Day massacre and its impact on the political decisions taken by the descendants of the massacre’s first victim, Admiral Gaspard de Coligny, especially the admiral’s son François de Châtillon (1557–91) and grandson Gaspard III of Châtillon (1584–1646). It argues that the tragic events surrounding the massacre played a crucial role in the identity and collective memory of a major aristocratic family in early modern France. This collective memory evolved as it was passed on and appropriated by each successive generation. While François de Châtillon pursued above all a desire to avenge Admiral Coligny’s ignominious death by continuing his fight against the house of Guise, for Gaspard III de Châtillon the admiral’s legacy became a moral obligation to continue his work in support of royal authority.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document