‘Many Contests of the Trojans and Achaeans’: The Iliad’s Battle Books

2019 ◽  
pp. 141-178
Author(s):  
Tobias Myers

Chapter 4 charts the continued use of the divine perspective to shape and reflect upon the dynamics of performance between Books 8 and 22. In these books, Homer continues to draw on the duel, daïs, and funerary paradigms to construct the battlefield contests as a live event commanding audience participation. The chapter’s first section examines patterns of divine and poetic ‘staging’, to demonstrate that the next three days of battle (in Books 8, 11–18, and 19–22 respectively), like the first day’s battle, are not only viewed from Zeus’ house on Olympus, but also closely patterned on the formal duel. The second section considers the significance of this strategy for the listening audience whom the poet is attempting to engage: they are invited to participate vicariously in the fighting, and also to reflect on their responses to the figure pulling the strings. The chapter’s third section focuses on the poet’s use of Zeus, primarily, to develop a perspective from which the contests trigger associations with funerary ritual. The chapter concludes with a metaperformative reading of the theomachia (‘battle of the gods’): the theomachia draws in new ways on both the duel and daïs paradigms, to present a provocative dramatization of poet-audience dynamics.

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra J. Winter ◽  
Jylana L. Sheats ◽  
Lauren A. Grieco ◽  
Eric B. Hekler ◽  
Matthew P. Buman ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-118
Author(s):  
CHRISTOPHER LOWE ◽  
ANN MacSWEEN ◽  
KATHLEEN McSWEENEY
Keyword(s):  

A collared urn was found during the course of a watching-brief on the raised beach on the north side of Oban bay. Post-excavation analysis has succeeded in throwing some further light on the chronology of this type of urn and possibly on some elements of the funerary ritual associated with its burial. The same watching-brief also revealed the site of a truncated pit of medieval date, filled with fire-cracked stones.


Author(s):  
Terence D. Keel

The proliferation of studies declaring that there is a genetic basis to health disparities and behavioral differences across the so-called races has encouraged the opponents of social constructionism to assert a victory for scientific progress over political correctness. I am not concerned in this essay with providing a response to critics who believe races are expressions of innate genetic or biological differences. Instead, I am interested in how genetic research on human differences has divided social constructionists over whether the race concept in science can be used for social justice and redressing embodied forms of discrimination. On one side, there is the position that race is an inherently flawed concept and that its continued use by scientists, medical professionals, and even social activists keeps alive the notion that it has a biological basis. On the other side of this debate are those who maintain a social constructionist position yet argue that not all instances of race in science stem from discriminatory politics or the desire to prove that humans belong to discrete biological units that can then be classified as superior or inferior. I would like to shift this debate away from the question of whether race is real and move instead toward thinking about the intellectual commitments necessary for science to expose past legacies of discrimination.


MIS Quarterly ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 1301-1312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kent Maret ◽  
◽  
Robert F. Otondo ◽  
G. Stephen Taylor ◽  
◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document