Introduction

Author(s):  
David Weir ◽  
Jane Desmarais

This introduction argues that even though decadence and culture are incompatible concepts, the former based on the idea of decay and the latter on the concept of growth, decadence is a type of culture in its own right, however much it may go against the grain of culture at large. This basic paradox is evident in the literature produced by such figures as Charles Baudelaire, J.-K. Huysmans, Rachilde, Arthur Symons, Oscar Wilde, and many others, all of whom drew creative energy from a sense of historical decline, philosophical pessimism, and sexual perversity. Moreover, the culture of decadence concerns not only forms of aesthetic expression such as literature and art, but also sensuous, lived experience, however self-destructive such experience might be. This “lived decadence,” moreover, was—and is—available not only to artists and writers on the margins of society but also to the economically secure and socially ascendant bourgeoisie, the beneficiaries of that very modernity so many decadents set themselves against.

Author(s):  
David Weir

The Introduction first considers the etymological and historical meanings of decadence. Different interpretations of the word “decadence” point to historical decline, social decay, and aesthetic inferiority. Decadence today may be best understood as the aesthetic expression of a conflicted attitude toward modernity, which first arose in nineteenth-century France and is best expressed by the author Charles Baudelaire (1821–1867). Decadence then “travelled” to London, where Oscar Wilde (1854–1900) became the preeminent decadent writer. Other metropolitan centers that made up part of the urban geography of decadence during the fifty-year period (1880–1930) of decadence’s peak were fin-de-siècle Vienna and Weimar Berlin.


Author(s):  
Rosina Neginsky

Les interférences entre l’art pictural, la critique d’art et l’écriture poétique, ainsi que les liens du poète avec les courants artistiques de son temps furent illustrés par plusieurs artistes dont Oscar Wilde (préraphaélites, Beardsley, Degas, Pissaro), Charles Baudelaire (Delacroix, Courbet, Manet, Guys ; cf. son poème Les Phares), Guillaume Apollinaire (Henri Rousseau), Aleksandr Blok (Vasnecov, Vrubel’). Ces interférences contribuent à élaborer une authentique recherche des lois qui régissent l’acte de création et la valeur art. Rosina Neginsky, poète d’origine russe, de culture anglo-française et d’expression anglaise, est à la fois auteur et objet d’étude de cet essai consacré à l’œuvre de Lyubov Momot, peintre-symboliste d’origine ukrainienne installée à Chicago. La similarité des thèmes, la circulation des métaphores picturales et verbales sont ainsi interprétées comme un dialogue inter-sémiotique entre les deux artistes contemporaines. L’auteur concentre son analyse sur le parallèle entre, d’une part, les styles et l’imaginaire de la peinture de Momot, et de l’autre, leur réfraction dans sa propre poésie. La perception de la peinture à travers le prisme de la parole poétique permet d’accéder à une nouvelle compréhension des métaphores visuelles et renforce l’acuité esthétique de la peinture. En plus de sa valeur analytique, l’essai offre la possibilité de découvrir la peinture de Luybov Momot et plusieurs poèmes inédits de Rosina Neginsky qui sortiront en novembre 2021 chez Austin Macauley Publishers à New York.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (28) ◽  
pp. 69-93
Author(s):  
Julio Marinho Ferreira

Este artigo discute uma possível relação que pode ser observada entre a noção de capitalismo e a arte da segunda metade do século XIX, mais especificamente a chamada literatura decadentista, ou simbolista. Esse período no qual reinou a influência de Charles Baudelaire nas vanguardas artísticas, e nas formas de apresentar um indivíduo que nascia sob a égide de uma sociedade capitalista, teve na modernidade e em suas rupturas estéticas uma forma de expressão da individualidade mais voltada ao consumo. Com isso, através de uma análise sociológica de algumas obras literárias daquele momento histórico, busco analisar quais seriam os impactos desse capitalismo para a formação de uma mentalidade artística, e de ruptura social. Com os trabalhos de Joris-Karl Huysmans, de Oscar Wilde e a abordagem crítica dos sociólogos Karl Marx e Friedrich Engels, além do filosofo e pensador social Walter Benjamin, procuro traçar paralelos entre uma crítica social e uma produção artística, nas quais o conceito acerca do belo, e suas emanações, pareceriam apontar para uma crítica ao modelo capitalista da sociedade da época, principalmente a noção burguesa de realidade.


Author(s):  
Raphaël Ingelbien

Aestheticism refers to a late-Victorian tendency to argue that art is its own justification and should therefore be judged by purely aesthetic criteria. Closely related to the doctrine of l’art pour l’art (art for art’s sake) put forward by Théophile Gautier and to the radical aesthetic theories of Charles Baudelaire, British aestheticism found its leading exponent in Walter Pater. His work had an immediate and profound impact on writers and artists like Oscar Wilde, who are sometimes referred to as aesthetes, and more often as decadents, and his lasting influence has been traced in the work of several major modernist writers. As a category of English literary history, the term "aestheticism" is a relatively recent scholarly construction. However, contemporaries used words like "aesthetes" and "aesthetic" to designate the late-Victorian phenomenon. The Greek word α ἰ σθητικός refers to "that which is perceptible by the senses;" in modern European thought, aesthetics is a branch of philosophy that analyses the ways in which artworks produce sensations in spectators and, more broadly, the nature and role of art.


1996 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-85
Author(s):  
Terri Gullickson ◽  
Pamela Ramser
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document