Cognitive Sociology and the Cultural Mind

2019 ◽  
pp. xviii-27
Author(s):  
Wayne H. Brekhus ◽  
Gabe Ignatow
Keyword(s):  
Social Science ◽  
Cultural Sociology ◽  
Process Models ◽  
Dual Process ◽  
Cognitive Sociology ◽  
Dual Process Models ◽  
Cognitive Social Science

This chapter introduces key debates and directions in cognitive sociology. It discusses cognitive sociology approaches ranging from cultural to social to embodied perspectives and identifies important tensions between competing cognitive sociology traditions. It highlights cultural cognitive sociology approaches that emphasize cultural, social, and organizational variation as well as embodied cognitive social science approaches that challenge cultural sociology and that emphasize the importance of neuropsychological dual-process models of cognition. It discusses the implications of these controversies and addresses attempts to synthesize the neurocognitive and the cultural. It concludes by introducing the chapters that constitute this volume.

scholarly journals What Are Dual Process Models? Implications for Cultural Analysis in Sociology

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 287-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar Lizardo ◽  
Robert Mowry ◽  
Brandon Sepulvado ◽  
Dustin S. Stoltz ◽  
Marshall A. Taylor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interdisciplinary Approach ◽  
Cultural Sociology ◽  
Cultural Analysis ◽  
Process Models ◽  
Dual Process ◽  
Dual Process Models ◽  
Memory Culture ◽  
Process Framework ◽  
Relevant Work ◽  
Theoretical Foundations

In this paper we introduce the idea of the dual process framework (DPF), an interdisciplinary approach to the study of learning, memory, thinking, and action. Departing from the successful reception of Vaisey (2009), we suggest that intradisciplinary debates in sociology regarding the merits of “dual process” formulations can benefit from a better understanding of the theoretical foundations of these models in cognitive and social psychology. We argue that the key is to distinguish the general DPF from more specific applications to particular domains, which we refer to as dual process models (DPMs). We show how different DPMs can be applied to a variety of analytically distinct issues of interest to cultural sociologists beyond specific issues related to morality, such as culture in learning, culture in memory, culture in thinking, and culture in acting processes. We close by outlining the implications of our argument for relevant work in cultural sociology.

scholarly journals What Are Dual Process Models? Implications for Cultural Analysis in Sociology

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dustin S. Stoltz ◽  
Omar Lizardo ◽  
Robert Mowry ◽  
Brandon Sepulvado ◽  
Justin Van Ness ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interdisciplinary Approach ◽  
Cultural Sociology ◽  
Cultural Analysis ◽  
Process Models ◽  
Dual Process ◽  
Dual Process Models ◽  
Memory Culture ◽  
Process Framework ◽  
Relevant Work ◽  
Theoretical Foundations

In this paper we introduce the idea of the dual process framework (DPF), an interdisciplinary approach to the study of learning, memory, thinking, and action. Departing from the successful reception of Vaisey (2009), we suggest that intradisciplinary debates in sociology regarding the merits of “dual process” formulations can benefit from a better understanding of the theoretical foundations of these models in cognitive and social psychology. We argue that the key is to distinguish the general DPF from more specific applications to particular domains, which we refer to as dual process models (DPMs). We show how different DPMs can be applied to a variety of analytically distinct issues of interest to cultural sociologists beyond specific issues related to morality, such as culture in learning, culture in memory, culture in thinking, and culture in acting processes. We close by outlining the implications of our argument for relevant work in cultural sociology.

Re-examining dominance of categories in impression formation: A test of dual-process models.

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian M. Monroe ◽  
Bryan L. Koenig ◽  
Kum Seong Wan ◽  
Tei Laine ◽  
Swati Gupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Impression Formation ◽  
Process Models ◽  
Dual Process ◽  
Dual Process Models

scholarly journals A mismatch with dual process models of addiction rooted in psychology

2008 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 460-460
Author(s):  
Reinout W. Wiers ◽  
Remco Havermans ◽  
Roland Deutsch ◽  
Alan W. Stacy
Keyword(s):  
Process Models ◽  
Dual Process ◽  
Planning System ◽  
Dual Process Models ◽  
Lack Of Fit ◽  
Psychological Studies

AbstractThe model of addiction proposed by Redish et al. shows a lack of fit with recent data and models in psychological studies of addiction. In these dual process models, relatively automatic appetitive processes are distinguished from explicit goal-directed expectancies and motives, whereas these are all grouped together in the planning system in the Redish et al. model. Implications are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document