Best Practices for Implementing Recreation Demand Models

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 302-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Lupi ◽  
Daniel J. Phaneuf ◽  
Roger H. von Haefen
2001 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 403-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis C. Nunes ◽  
Maria A. Cunha-e-Sá ◽  
Maria M. Ducla-Soares ◽  
Márcia A. Rosado ◽  
Brett H. Day

1986 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
George L. Peterson ◽  
Daniel J. Stynes

1974 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 165-169
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Jennings ◽  
Kenneth C. Gibbs

Some currently popular procedures for analyzing the demand for outdoor recreation makes use of ancillary travel and on-site expenditures of recreationists as proxy prices. It can yet regrettably be asked whether the estimates produced by those methods bear any resemblance to the market-equivalent price-quantity relationships they generally purport to quantify. To some unavoidable extent this results from the necessary reliance upon proxies, or surrogates, for both quantity and price data. The ultimate value of proxy variables and of estimated relationships between them lies in the extent to which they resemble useful concepts. Past research has been based largely on assumptions of the resemblance.


1980 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 798-800 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael E. Wetzstein ◽  
John G. McNeely

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Antora Mohsena Haque ◽  
Candace Brakewood ◽  
Shahrbanoo Rezaei ◽  
Anahita Khojandi

American cities have been implementing park-and-rides (PNRs) since the 1930s; however, there has been a recent resurgence of literature examining this type of transit station. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of the current literature on PNRs and directions for future research. PNR studies published in the last ten years were reviewed and text mining was applied to extract key themes. Six themes were identified. The two most common areas of research were network equilibrium and optimization (12 of 37 studies) and demand models (8 of 37 studies). This was followed by guidelines and best practices as well as comparative studies (6 of 37 studies each). Parking utilization had the fewest number of recent studies (3 of 37 studies). This review revealed that the majority of PNR studies were conducted in geographic areas with extensive transit services, most studies have focused on rail-based PNRs, and the most widely used method was multinomial logit. Some areas for future research include studying remote PNRs, examining bus-based PNRs, and assessing the impact of emerging modes on PNR utilization. This systematic review could assist planners and transit agencies in further improving sustainable PNR networks in their cities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document