scholarly journals Model-based analysis of implanted hypoglossal nerve stimulation for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea

SLEEP ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S11-S19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew D Johnson ◽  
Yazan M Dweiri ◽  
Jason Cornelius ◽  
Kingman P Strohl ◽  
Armin Steffen ◽  
...  

Abstract Study Objectives Individuals with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), characterized by frequent sleep disruptions from tongue muscle relaxation and airway blockage, are known to benefit from on-demand electrical stimulation of the hypoglossal nerve. Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) therapy, which activates the protrusor muscles of the tongue during inspiration, has been established in multiple clinical studies as safe and effective, but the mechanistic understanding for why some stimulation parameters work better than others has not been thoroughly investigated. Methods In this study, we developed a detailed biophysical model that can predict the spatial recruitment of hypoglossal nerve fascicles and axons within these fascicles during stimulation through nerve cuff electrodes. Using this model, three HNS programming scenarios were investigated including grouped cathode (---), single cathode (o-o), and guarded cathode bipolar (+-+) electrode configurations. Results Regardless of electrode configuration, nearly all hypoglossal nerve axons circumscribed by the nerve cuff were recruited for stimulation amplitudes <3 V. Within this range, monopolar configurations required lower stimulation amplitudes than the guarded bipolar configuration to elicit action potentials within hypoglossal nerve axons. Further, the spatial distribution of the activated axons was more uniform for monopolar versus guarded bipolar configurations. Conclusions The computational models predicted that monopolar HNS provided the lowest threshold and the least sensitivity to rotational angle of the nerve cuff around the hypoglossal nerve; however, this setting also increased the likelihood for current leakage outside the nerve cuff, which could potentially activate axons in unintended branches of the hypoglossal nerve. Clinical Trial Registration NCT01161420.

FACE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-70
Author(s):  
Paul B. Lee ◽  
Michael T. Chung ◽  
Jared Johnson ◽  
Jordyn Lucas ◽  
Caitlin R. Priest ◽  
...  

Objective: There is a high prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in pediatric and adult Down Syndrome (DS) patients that is refractory to adenotonsillectomy and continuous positive airway pressure. Newer treatment modalities have emerged with improved outcomes. The objective is to provide an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze the clinical outcomes of OSA in pediatric and adult DS patients with hypoglossal nerve stimulation using Inspire, midline posterior glossectomy plus lingual tonsillectomy (MPG + LT), and combined genioglossus advancement plus radiofrequency (GGS + RF). Methods: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed and Google Scholar was performed followed by a meta-analysis. Studies with preoperative and post-operative Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) values were included with patients serving as their own control. Results: Across 5 studies, 56 patients were analyzed. The mean reduction in AHI was statistically significant before vs. after procedure ( P < .001 for hypoglossal nerve stimulation using Inspire with a paired 2-tailed t-test and P = .031 for MPG + LT). Although individual patient AHI values were unavailable in the GGS + RF study, the standard difference in mean AHI was also significant for GGS + RF with P = .001. Device malfunction was the most common complication for Inspire while postoperative bleeding was observed for MPG + LT and nasopharyngeal obstruction and retropalatal collapse were observed for GGS + RF. Conclusion: This review reveals significant improvement in AHI with Inspire, MPG + LT, and GGS + RF for DS patients with refractory OSA. Further investigation is needed for comparison between these 3 therapies.


2019 ◽  
Vol 130 (9) ◽  
pp. 2275-2280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen M. Sarber ◽  
Katherine W. Chang ◽  
Madison V. Epperson ◽  
Meredith E. Tabangin ◽  
Mekibib Altaye ◽  
...  

QJM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Mahmoud ◽  
A Mohamed ◽  
A Mohamed ◽  
H Nasr

Abstract Background Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a serious, potentially life-threatening disorder. There are many treatment modalities are being used, but none of them gained consensus. Continuous positive airway pressure considered the most widely accepted treatment of OSA but very poor adherence limits its effectiveness, thus was the need for alternative therapy of high compliance and effective for long term. Aim of the Work To perform a meta-analysis of the available studies included outcomes of hypoglossal nerve stimulation to evaluate its effectiveness as a choice of treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Patients and Methods The study included published medical articles that evaluated the efficacy of hypoglossal nerve stimulation as treatment of obstructive sleep apnea with outcomes for primary outcome measures apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), oxygen desaturation index (ODI), and for secondary outcome measures Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) before and after implantation. Results Eight prospective studies with 329 patients were included in this met analysis. At 12 months, statistical analysis demonstrated significant reductions in AHI, ODI with standardized mean difference of -1.3940 (95% CI: -1.7745 to -1.0136; P = 0.0042), -0.9188 (95% CI: -1.3040 to -0.5337; p = 0.0002) respectively, and -not significant- reduction in ESS, FOSQ with standardized mean difference of -1.0365 (95% CI: -1.1889 to -0.8841; p = 0.2290), 1.0545 (95% CI: 0.8867 to 1.2223; p = 0.4922), respectively. Similar were observed at 6 months. Conclusion Hypoglossal nerve stimulation results in significant improvement of primary outcome measures of OSA with significant reduction of apnea episodes. It could be considered as an effective -but still of high cost- alternative for OSA patients. Further studies comparing HNS to other therapies are needed.


SLEEP ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A220-A220
Author(s):  
Clara H Lee ◽  
James Reese ◽  
Everett G Seay ◽  
Xin Wu ◽  
Raj C Dedhia

2019 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. S100-S101
Author(s):  
P. Eastwood ◽  
M. Barnes ◽  
S. Mackay ◽  
J. Wheatley ◽  
D. Hillman ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 126 (11) ◽  
pp. 2618-2623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Friedman ◽  
Ofer Jacobowitz ◽  
Michelle S. Hwang ◽  
Wolfgang Bergler ◽  
Ingo Fietze ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 151 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. P26-P27
Author(s):  
Ryan J. Soose ◽  
B. Tucker Woodson ◽  
Eric J. Kezirian ◽  
Ofer Jacobowitz ◽  
M. Boyd Gillespie

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document