CONCURRENT VALIDITY OF THE PEDIATRIC CLINICAL TEST OF SENSORY INTERACTION FOR BALANCE WITH THE BRUININKS OSERETSKY TEST OF MOTOR PROFICIENCY AND THE CHATTECX BALANCE SYSTEM IN CHILDREN WITH BALANCE DYSFUNCTION

1997 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 197
Author(s):  
Debi Berghuis-Kelly ◽  
Kim Chenet ◽  
Francie Hansen ◽  
Sara Westcott
2015 ◽  
Vol 09 (03) ◽  
pp. 311-318
Author(s):  
Surendra Ukamath ◽  
Nirali Jetley ◽  
Rama Prabhu ◽  
T. Pandian

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-45 ◽  

ABSTRACT The balance system requires the interaction of appropriate sensory inputs, a sound processor and coordinated outputs. The human body relies primarily on three important sensory inputs, i.e. somatosensory, visual and vestibular. Not only do these inputs provide vital information as regards body orientation and position but also interact with each other so as to provide a balanced fodder for the central nervous system to process. Situations arise in clinical practice wherein patients lack one or more of these inputs, and need to excessively rely on the others for maintaining balance. Such patients may be able to ordinarily maintain their sense of balance during daily activities, and only when exposed to adverse or stressful situations, do they need to practice caution; and then, there are some who do not even have the luxury of managing their daily activities with ease. It is vital for the therapist to assess and identify the weaknesses of a patient as regards the sensory inputs and help them to capitalise on their strengths. The clinical test for the sensory integration of balance is a simple test that has been devised to easily and rapidly assess the dependence of a patient on various inputs and devise a rehabilitative strategy customized to each patient. The test also has other applications besides simply assessing balance inputs and they have been briefly described. How to cite this article Khattar VS, Hathiram BT. The Clinical Test for the Sensory Interaction of Balance. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Clin 2012;4(1):41-45.


2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 292-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moo Kyun Park ◽  
Kyoung-Min Kim ◽  
Jiwoong Jung ◽  
Naree Lee ◽  
Sun Jin Hwang ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 46 (9) ◽  
pp. 793-800 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. K. Richardson ◽  
S. W. Atwater ◽  
T. K. Crowe ◽  
J. C. Deitz

2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 278-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan C. Amor-Dorado ◽  
María P. Barreira-Fernández ◽  
Tomas R. Vázquez-Rodríguez ◽  
José A. Miranda-Filloy ◽  
Javier Llorca ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 313-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nithinun Chaikeeree ◽  
Vitoon Saengsirisuwan ◽  
Butsara Chinsongkram ◽  
Rumpa Boonsinsukh

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (02) ◽  
pp. 133-143
Author(s):  
Rumpa Boonsinsukh ◽  
Bodin Khumnonchai ◽  
Vitoon Saengsirisuwan ◽  
Nithinun Chaikeeree

Background: The type of foam pad used in the modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction and Balance (mCTSIB) influences the accuracy with which elderly fallers are identified. Two types of foam are commonly used in practice: Airex and Neurocom foam. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy with which elderly fallers can be identified when the Airex foam and Neurocom foam are used in the mCTSIB. Methods: One hundred eighty-four elderly participants with a mean age of 69 years were classified into faller and nonfaller groups based on their 12-month fall history. Balance stability was measured under four conditions of the mCTSIB for 120 s each: standing on a floor or a foam pad with their eyes open or eyes closed. The time needed to maintain stability was measured by a stopwatch, and postural sway characteristics were measured using an acceleration-based system. Comparisons between groups were performed by two-way mixed ANOVA. The accuracy of differentiating elderly fallers from nonfallers with different foam types was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. The time to maintain stability under four conditions of the mCTSIB (composite score) and under two conditions on the foam (foam score) were used for the ROC analysis. Results: The results showed that the nonfallers required more time to maintain stability and had a smaller sway area than the fallers ([Formula: see text]). The foam led to a larger difference between groups, suggesting the use of foam in examining the risk of falls. The Airex and the Neurocom foam pads led to a large area under the curve (0.93 to 0.95) in identifying elderly fallers and nonfallers when the composite and foam scores were used. A cutoff score of 447/480 s for the composite score and 223/240 s for the foam score yielded a posttest accuracy of 88% to 89%, with a sensitivity of 0.80–0.92 and specificity of 0.88–0.95. Conclusion: In conclusion, Airex and Neurocom foam can be used interchangeably with guidance in the mCTSIB, as they led to the accurate identification of elderly fallers among older persons who could walk and live independently in the community.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document