Partial liquid ventilation and positive end-expiratory pressure reduce ventilator-induced lung injury in an ovine model of acute respiratory failure

2002 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 182-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig A. Reickert ◽  
Preston B. Rich ◽  
Stefania Crotti ◽  
Simon A. Mahler ◽  
Samir S. Awad ◽  
...  
1998 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 833-843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Quintel ◽  
Michael Heine ◽  
Ronald B. Hirschl ◽  
Rene Tillmanns ◽  
Valeska Wessendorf

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pauline K. Park ◽  
Nicole L Werner ◽  
Carl Haas

Invasive and noninvasive ventilation are important tools in the clinician’s armamentarium for managing acute respiratory failure. Although these modalities do not treat the underlying disease, they can provide the necessary oxygenation and ventilatory support until the causal pathology resolves. Care must be taken as even appropriate application can cause harm. Knowledge of pulmonary mechanics, appreciation of the basic machine settings, and an understanding of how common and advanced modes function allows the clinician to optimally tailor support to the patient while limiting iatrogenic injury. This second chapter reviews indications for mechanical ventilation, routine management, troubleshooting, and liberation from mechanical ventilation This review contains 6 figures, 7 tables and 60 references Keywords: Mechanical ventilation, lung protective ventilation, sedation, ventilator-induced lung injury, liberation from mechanical ventilation 


2001 ◽  
Vol 36 (9) ◽  
pp. 1333-1336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorothy A. Lewis ◽  
Danny Colton ◽  
Kent Johnson ◽  
Ronald B. Hirschl

1996 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S138-S138
Author(s):  
Gerfried Zobel ◽  
Bernd Urlesberger ◽  
Drago Dacar ◽  
Siegfried Rödl ◽  
Friz Reiterer ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 278-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo Gama de Abreu ◽  
André Domingues Quelhas ◽  
Peter Spieth ◽  
Götz Bräuer ◽  
Lilla Knels ◽  
...  

Background It is currently not known whether vaporized perfluorohexane is superior to partial liquid ventilation (PLV) for therapy of acute lung injury. In this study, the authors compared the effects of both therapies in oleic acid-induced lung injury. Methods Lung injury was induced in 30 anesthetized and mechanically ventilated pigs by means of central venous infusion of oleic acid. Animals were assigned to one of the following groups: (1) control or gas ventilation (GV), (2) 2.5% perfluorohexane vapor, (3) 5% perfluorohexane vapor, (4) 10% perfluorohexane vapor, or (5) PLV with perfluorooctane (30 ml/kg). Two hours after randomization, lungs were recruited and positive end-expiratory pressure was adjusted to obtain minimal elastance. Ventilation was continued during 4 additional hours, when animals were killed for lung histologic examination. Results Gas exchange and elastance were comparable among vaporized perfluorohexane, PLV, and GV before the open lung approach was used and improved in a similar fashion in all groups after positive end-expiratory pressure was adjusted to optimal elastance (P < 0.05). A similar behavior was observed in functional residual capacity (FRC) in animals treated with vaporized perfluorohexane and GV. Lung resistance improved after recruitment (P < 0.05), but values were higher in the 10% perfluorohexane and PLV groups as compared with GV (P < 0.05). Interestingly, positive end-expiratory pressure values required to obtain minimal elastance were lower with 5% perfluorohexane than with PLV and GV (P < 0.05). In addition, diffuse alveolar damage was significantly lower in the 5% and 10% perfluorohexane vapor groups as compared with PLV and GV (P < 0.05). Conclusions Although the use of 5% vaporized perfluorohexane permitted the authors to reduce pressures needed to stabilize the lungs and was associated with better histologic findings than were PLV and GV, none of these perfluorocarbon therapies improved gas exchange or lung mechanics as compared with GV.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document