Identification of Speech by Cochlear Implant Recipients with the Multipeak (MPEAK) and Spectral Peak (SPEAK) Speech Coding Strategies II. Consonants

1999 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 443-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret W. Skinner ◽  
Marios S. Fourakis ◽  
Timothy A. Holden ◽  
Laura K. Holden ◽  
Marilyn E. Demorest
1996 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 182-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret W. Skinner ◽  
Marios S. Fourakis ◽  
Timothy A. Holden ◽  
Laura K. Holden ◽  
Marilyn E. Demorest

1995 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 49-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura K. Holden ◽  
Margaret W. Skinner ◽  
Timothy A. Holden ◽  
Susan M. Binzer

Eight subjects participated in a comparison of the multipeak (MPEAK) and spectral peak (SPEAK) speech coding strategies of the Nucleus TM 22-channel cochlear implant system as part of a long-term monitoring study. Sound-field threshold levels and speech recognition performance on the Bamford-Kowal-Bench Sentence Test, NU-6 Monosyllabic Word Test, and Connected Speech Test or CID Everyday Sentence Test were analyzed for the two speech coding strategies. For the group, speech recognition performance was significantly higher with the SPEAK speech coding strategy than with the MPEAK strategy on all speech tests. For individual subjects, scores with the SPEAK strategy were significantly higher for some subjects on each of the speech tests. None of the subjects scored significantly higher on any of the tests with MPEAK.


2005 ◽  
Vol 69 (12) ◽  
pp. 1667-1674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Manrique ◽  
Alicia Huarte ◽  
Constantino Morera ◽  
Laura Caballé ◽  
Angel Ramos ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 145 (2) ◽  
pp. 818-821
Author(s):  
Thomas Bentsen ◽  
Stefan J. Mauger ◽  
Abigail A. Kressner ◽  
Tobias May ◽  
Torsten Dau

1995 ◽  
Vol 115 (2) ◽  
pp. 264-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. H. Chouard ◽  
M. Ouayoun ◽  
B. Meyer ◽  
C. Fugain

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document