Does catheter tip stiffness affect the incidence of complications during the lower thoracic epidural catheterization?

2005 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement 34) ◽  
pp. 105
Author(s):  
A. Ogura ◽  
T. Saito ◽  
Z. Wajima ◽  
T. Yoshikawa ◽  
T. Inoue
2006 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshitaka Takii ◽  
Koki Sunouchi ◽  
Masao Tadokoro ◽  
Yujiro Murata ◽  
Yoshiko Unno ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 343-343
Author(s):  
Jen-Hsuan Huang ◽  
Chih-Jen Hung ◽  
Chih-Cheng Wu

1997 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reiner M. Giebler ◽  
Ralf U. Scherer ◽  
Jurgen Peters

Background Due to potential neurologic sequelae, the risk:benefit ratio of thoracic epidural analgesia is controversial. Surprisingly, however, few available data address neurologic complications. The incidence of neurologic complications occurring after thoracic epidural catheterization was studied in patients scheduled for abdominal or abdominothoracic surgery. Methods A total of 4,185 patients were studied, including 2,059 during the prospective phase of the study and 2,126 during the retrospective phase. After thoracic epidural catheterization, all patients received general anesthesia. Patients' neurologic status was assessed by an anesthesiologist using clinical criteria after operation and after epidural catheter removal. If neurologic complications were suspected, a neurologist was consulted. The incidence of specific complications was compared for different thoracic puncture sites: upper (T3/4-6/7), mid (T7/8-8/9), and lower (T9/10-11/12) catheter insertion levels. Results The overall incidence of complications after thoracic epidural catheterization was 3.1% (n = 128). This included dural perforation (0.7%; n = 30); unsuccessful catheter placement (1.1%; n = 45); postoperative radicular type pain (0.2%; n = 9), responsive to catheter withdrawal in all cases; and peripheral nerve lesions (0.6%; n = 24), 0.3% (n = 14) of which were peroneal nerve palsies probably related to surgical positioning or other transient peripheral nerve lesions (0.2%; n = 10). No signs suggesting epidural hematoma were recognized, and there were no permanent sensory or motor defects attributable to epidural catheterization. Unintentional dural perforation was observed significantly more often in the lower (3.4%) than in the mid (0.9%), or upper (0.4%) thoracic region. A single patient experienced severe respiratory depression after receiving epidural buprenorphine but recovered without sequelae. Conclusions Thoracic epidural catheterization for abdominal and thoracoabdominal surgery is not associated with a high incidence of serious neurologic complications. In fact, the incidence of puncture- and catheter-related complications is less in the mid and upper than in lower thoracic region, and the predicted maximum risk for permanent neurologic complications (upper bound of the 95% confidence interval) is 0.07%.


2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (12) ◽  
pp. 162-165
Author(s):  
Patricia Hernández-Puiggròs ◽  
Antonio Montes ◽  
Alberto Solano ◽  
José L. Aguilar ◽  
Gerardo Conesa ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 104 (1) ◽  
pp. 236
Author(s):  
Ali Alag??z ◽  
Hilal Sazak ◽  
Song??l ??zkazan?? ◽  
Eser Savkiliodlu

1997 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 299 ◽  
Author(s):  
REINER M. GIEBLER ◽  
RALF U. SCHERER ◽  
J??RGEN PETERS ◽  
George F. Rich

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document