scholarly journals 02 / A clinical retrospective study comparing thoracic epidural catheterization between awake and anesthetized patients.

Author(s):  
Tae-Yun Sung
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-101
Author(s):  
Seok-Jin Lee ◽  
Sung-Ae Cho ◽  
Chi Bum In ◽  
Tae-Yun Sung ◽  
Po-Soon Kang

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 20-25
Author(s):  
Laxmi Pathak

INTRODUCTION: Epidural analgesia has been used in many major surgeries like upper abdominal surgery, cardio-thoracic surgery, orthopedic surgery etc. Epidural analgesia is one of the commonly used methods of postoperative pain control despite its associated complications. So, this study was conducted to find out its effectiveness in major orthopedic surgeries done in Universal College of Medical Sciences. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was done at Universal College of Medical Sciences & Teaching Hospital, Bhairahawa, Nepal from July 2012 to June 2014. Data of 57 patients, aged between 17 to 91 years having American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1 and 2 who had undergone major orthopedic surgeries under spinal anesthesia and lumber epidural catheterization were collected and important information regarding anesthesia and surgery, epidural catheter and postoperative epidural analgesia, any complications if occurred throughout the study period were recorded. Departmental Protocol for epidural analgesia was followed in these patients. Patients who received intraoperative epidural anesthesia or analgesia and any other anesthetic or analgesic agents were excluded in this study. RESULTS: This study found epidural analgesia, a very effective way to relieve pain in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgeries, when given according to the Departmental Protocol. There were no any complications related to epidural analgesia till 4th postoperative day. Out of 57, only 2 patients received injection Ketorolac intravenously as a rescue analgesic at the same day of operation before epidural top up. Average time to demand for analgesic after the last dose of epidural top up was 21.933 hours. All patients were mobilized around their beds on 2nd postoperative day. The average postoperative days of hospital stay was only 6.5 days. CONCLUSION: Epidural mixture of Bupivacaine-morphine in lower dose and concentration given as an intermittent bolus dosing via lumber epidural catheter is safe and very effective in relieving postoperative pain after major orthopedic surgeries without any significant complications.Journal of Universal College of Medical Sciences (2015) Vol.03 No.02 Issue 10   


2006 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshitaka Takii ◽  
Koki Sunouchi ◽  
Masao Tadokoro ◽  
Yujiro Murata ◽  
Yoshiko Unno ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement 35) ◽  
pp. 35-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Rubeš ◽  
M. Lipš ◽  
T. Ěermák ◽  
J. Kunstýø ◽  
T Kotulák ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement 34) ◽  
pp. 105
Author(s):  
A. Ogura ◽  
T. Saito ◽  
Z. Wajima ◽  
T. Yoshikawa ◽  
T. Inoue

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 343-343
Author(s):  
Jen-Hsuan Huang ◽  
Chih-Jen Hung ◽  
Chih-Cheng Wu

1997 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reiner M. Giebler ◽  
Ralf U. Scherer ◽  
Jurgen Peters

Background Due to potential neurologic sequelae, the risk:benefit ratio of thoracic epidural analgesia is controversial. Surprisingly, however, few available data address neurologic complications. The incidence of neurologic complications occurring after thoracic epidural catheterization was studied in patients scheduled for abdominal or abdominothoracic surgery. Methods A total of 4,185 patients were studied, including 2,059 during the prospective phase of the study and 2,126 during the retrospective phase. After thoracic epidural catheterization, all patients received general anesthesia. Patients' neurologic status was assessed by an anesthesiologist using clinical criteria after operation and after epidural catheter removal. If neurologic complications were suspected, a neurologist was consulted. The incidence of specific complications was compared for different thoracic puncture sites: upper (T3/4-6/7), mid (T7/8-8/9), and lower (T9/10-11/12) catheter insertion levels. Results The overall incidence of complications after thoracic epidural catheterization was 3.1% (n = 128). This included dural perforation (0.7%; n = 30); unsuccessful catheter placement (1.1%; n = 45); postoperative radicular type pain (0.2%; n = 9), responsive to catheter withdrawal in all cases; and peripheral nerve lesions (0.6%; n = 24), 0.3% (n = 14) of which were peroneal nerve palsies probably related to surgical positioning or other transient peripheral nerve lesions (0.2%; n = 10). No signs suggesting epidural hematoma were recognized, and there were no permanent sensory or motor defects attributable to epidural catheterization. Unintentional dural perforation was observed significantly more often in the lower (3.4%) than in the mid (0.9%), or upper (0.4%) thoracic region. A single patient experienced severe respiratory depression after receiving epidural buprenorphine but recovered without sequelae. Conclusions Thoracic epidural catheterization for abdominal and thoracoabdominal surgery is not associated with a high incidence of serious neurologic complications. In fact, the incidence of puncture- and catheter-related complications is less in the mid and upper than in lower thoracic region, and the predicted maximum risk for permanent neurologic complications (upper bound of the 95% confidence interval) is 0.07%.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document