Functional Outcome of Patients with Unstable Pelvic Ring Fractures Stabilized with Open Reduction and Internal Fixation

Author(s):  
Gary S. Gruen ◽  
Michael E. Leit ◽  
Rebecca J. Gruen ◽  
Herbert G. Garrison ◽  
Thomas E. Auble ◽  
...  
2003 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 555-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sevki Kabak ◽  
Mehmet Halici ◽  
Mehmet Tuncel ◽  
Levent Avsarogullar ◽  
Ali Baktir ◽  
...  

Orthopedics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 1165-1171
Author(s):  
Panagiotis Korovessis ◽  
Andreas Baikousis ◽  
Marios Stamatakis ◽  
Pavios Katonis

Author(s):  
Eric W. Van den Bosch ◽  
Richard Van der Kleyn ◽  
Mike Hogervorst ◽  
Arie B. Van Vugt

1994 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 1012
Author(s):  
Gary S. Gruen ◽  
Rebecca J. Gruen ◽  
Herbert G. Garrison ◽  
Thomas E. Auble ◽  
Andrew B. Peitzman

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 3266-3269
Author(s):  
Abhishek Patil

Proximal humerus fractures account for about 4% to 5% of all fractures. Following distal forearm fracture, proximal humeral fracture is the second most common upper extremity fracture. Kirschner (K)-Wires, external fixation, tension band wiring, and rush pins, intramedullary nails, ORIF with plates, and shoulder hemiarthroplasty have all been offered as therapeutic options. The purpose of this study was to assess the functional outcome and complication rates following internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using a locking compression plate. Patients over the age of 18 with closed proximal humerus fractures or open proximal humerus fractures (Gustilo and Anderson type I, Type II) received open reduction and internal fixation with locking compression plate in the current study. The participants in this study were 60 people who had a proximal humerus fracture and were treated with open reduction and a proximal humerus locking compression plate. Patients ranged in age from 20 to 85 years old, with a mean age of 51.14 +/- 17.30 years. The age group 36–55 years (37 percent) was the most prevalent, followed by 56–75 years (30 %). The majority of patients (76.7 %) were men who had been in automobile accidents on the right side (83 %) (63 %). According to the Neer classification, the most prevalent type of fracture was a three-part fracture (53 %). The maximum union time observed in this study was 16 weeks, with a minimum of 10 weeks. The average time to union is 12.52 +/- 1.14 weeks. The mean flexion at the end of six months was 121.660 +/- 19.84. The mean internal rotation was 57.330 +/- 8.48, the mean external rotation was 530 +/- 11.98, and the mean abduction was 1180 +/- 19.36. 75.28 +/- 9.66 [Mean +/- SD] is the Mean Constant score. Pain 14.10, ADL 18.26, range of motion 22.46, and power 20 were the mean scores observed on Constant Score for its various aspects. According to the Constant score, the functional outcome of the 60 patients was as follows: 8 patients had excellent outcomes (13%), 34 patients had good outcomes (56.7%), 16 patients had moderate outcomes (26.7%), and two patients had poor outcomes (26.7%) and (3 %). Internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures with a locking compression plate results in anatomical reduction and secure fixation, resulting in a favorable functional outcome.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Bhogendra Bahadur KC ◽  
Norman Lamichhane ◽  
Chandra Bahadur Mishra ◽  
Bharat Bahadur Khatri ◽  
Sabita Dhakal

Background: Supracondylar fracture of the distal humerus is one of the commonest fracture in pediatric age group. Though there is consensus of treating type III fracture operatively, no study has compared the outcome between Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning (CRPP) and Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF) with k-wire in our setup. Materials and Methods: Retrospective comparison study was done on eighty seven cases of Type III supracondylar fracture of distal humerus underwent operative procedure. Fifty four (54) cases underwent CRPP and 33 cases were managed with ORIF with k-wire, and they were followed up till 6 months post-operatively. Results : The mean time for radiological union in patient who underwent CRPP was 4.37±0.94 weeks and that for the patient who underwent ORIF was 4.45±0.13 weeks, the difference of which was statistically insignificant (p-value >0.05). 83.3% of CRPP group and 78.8% in ORIF group had excellent functional outcome and only 3% in ORIF group had poor functional outcome. Conclusion: Though both the group don’t have significant advantage of functional outcome among each other CRPP with limited attempt should be preferred to ORIF with k-wire for the advantage of avoiding surgical scar and reducing surgery time and exposure to anaesthetic agents.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document