A Comparative Study of Facial Growth Following Cleft Lip Repair with or without Soft-Tissue Undermining

1982 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. 745-753 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janusz Bardach ◽  
Mark Mooney ◽  
Z. L. Giedrojc-Juraha
1991 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 735-746
Author(s):  
Leonard B. Kaban ◽  
Michael T. Longaker ◽  
Michael Stern ◽  
Thomas B. Dodson ◽  
Brian Schmidt ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 140 (4) ◽  
pp. 757-764
Author(s):  
Georgina S. A. Phillips ◽  
Marc C. Swan ◽  
Adam R. Sawyer ◽  
Tim E. E. Goodacre ◽  
Michael Cadier

2008 ◽  
Vol 36 (8) ◽  
pp. 431-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katja Schwenzer-Zimmerer ◽  
Despina Chaitidis ◽  
Isabelle Berg-Boerner ◽  
Zdzislav Krol ◽  
Laszlo Kovacs ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Akeem O. Alawode ◽  
Michael O. Adeyemi ◽  
Olutayo James ◽  
Mobolanle O. Ogunlewe ◽  
Azeez Butali ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (7) ◽  
pp. 919-922
Author(s):  
Daniel C. Sasson ◽  
Sergey Y. Turin ◽  
Arun K. Gosain

Despite timely repair of cleft lip, secondary deformities such as vermilion notching or “whistle deformity” often require further surgical treatment. The use of dermis-fat graft for soft tissue augmentation of the upper lip is an established technique. We propose an innovation on this technique, by which the dermis-fat graft can be placed reliably and with minimal dissection by use of a soft red rubber sheath to protect the Keith needle while delivering the graft through the submucosal pocket in the dry vermilion, thereby avoiding the needle inadvertently catching soft tissue inside the pocket. We recommend using an 8F red rubber catheter, cutting the catheter to be just shorter than a 2.5-inch Keith needle. This provides a sheath through which the Keith needle can be passed within the submucosal vermilion tunnel. We believe this to be much more reliable for vermilion augmentation than other techniques, including fat injection, and makes graft inset more predictable, faster, and simpler.


1978 ◽  
Vol 86 (5) ◽  
pp. ORL-786-ORL-803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl J. Eisbach ◽  
Janusz Bardach

This project was designed to determine whether cleft lip repair has an influence on facial growth. To study this, 62 rabbits were divided into four groups: control, control without repair, Millard-type repair, and Bardach-type repair. Surgical clefts of the lip, alveolus, and the palate were created in 6-week-old rabbits. Periodic measurements were made of the pressure exerted by the lip on the maxillary alveolus. The animals were killed 20 weeks postoperatively. The skulls were processed and measurements were taken from the skulls. The pressure measurements showed a definite increase in lip pressure on the maxillary alveolus for the lip repair group. This pressure was high soon after surgery, rapidly returned toward the control level, but never reached it. Skull measurements indicate an inhibition in anterior maxillary growth for the “control without repair” group. This inhibition was even more profound in the two lip repair groups. No significant differences were found in maxillary width or mandibular length. When correlations were made to see if increased lip pressure resulted in decreased anterior maxillary growth, a significant correlation was found for both lip repair groups. This means that as the pressure of the lip repair increased, it resulted in a decrease in anterior maxillary growth. The data reported here indicates that cleft lip surgery must be considered as having a definite influence on anterior maxillary growth inhibition observed in the cleft lip and palate population. Further studies are indicated to determine the role of cleft palate repair on facial growth.


1991 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 603-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas B. Dodson ◽  
Brian Schmidt ◽  
Michael T. Longaker ◽  
Leonard B. Kaban

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document