Orbital floor reconstruction with symphyseal bone graft.

1999 ◽  
Vol 103 (7) ◽  
pp. 2096
Author(s):  
Ezatollah Hazrati
1970 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pujisriyani Prawoto ◽  
Siti Handayani ◽  
Kristaninta Bangun

Background: Fractures of the orbital floor require surgical intervention in group of patients with cosmetic problems and/or vertical diplopia. The surgical management of these patients provides a great challenge to the surgeon. A variety of implant materials have been used to recreate normal bony orbital dimension or supplement deficient orbital volume which include alloplastic or autogenous materials. The purpose of this case series was to assess the aesthetic and functional outcome of orbital floor reconstruction performed with calvarial bone graft, titanium mesh, absorbable mesh and “Turkish Delight” diced cartilage graft.Patients and Methods: From 2006-2010, we treated eight patients with orbital blowout fracture using various modalities. We used titanium mesh, absorbable mesh, calvarial bone graft and “Turkish delight” diced cartilage. These various modalities were chosen based on clinical examination, patient satisfaction, radiographic investigations and the cost on managing patient.Result: Calvarial bone graft were performed in two patient, “Turkish delight” diced cartilage in one patient, absorbable mesh in one patient, and titanium mesh in four patient. All patients had satisfactory result with adequate volume correction and reduction in vertical diplopia.Summary: All four materials, calvarial graft, titanium mesh, absorbable mesh, and “Turkish delight” diced cartilage graft have the potential to be useful reconstructive materials in orbital floor blowout fractures based on holistic consideration.


2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 512-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadeusz Cieślik ◽  
Jacek Skowronek ◽  
Magdalena Cieślik ◽  
Agata Cieślik-Bielecka

Author(s):  
Mohamed Esmail Khalil ◽  
Mohamed Farag Khalil ◽  
Raafat Mohyeldeen Abdelrahman ◽  
Ahmed Mohamed Kamal Elshafei ◽  
Tamer Ismail Gawdat

2015 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hitoshi Nemoto ◽  
Yoshinori Ito ◽  
Yoshiaki Kasai ◽  
Naoki Maruyama ◽  
Naohiro Kimura ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yihao Liu ◽  
Ehsan Azimi ◽  
Nikhil Dave ◽  
Cecil Qiu ◽  
Robin Yang ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Thomas ◽  
Scott M. Graham ◽  
Keith D. Carter ◽  
Jeffrey A. Nerad

Background Enophthalmos in a patient with an opacified hypoplastic maxillary sinus, without sinus symptomatology, describes the silent sinus syndrome. A current trend is to perform endoscopic maxillary antrostomy and orbital floor reconstruction as a single-staged operation. A two-staged approach is performed at our institution to avoid placement of an orbital floor implant in the midst of potential infection and allow for the possibility that enophthalmos and global ptosis may resolve with endoscopic antrostomy alone, obviating the need for orbital floor reconstruction. Methods A retrospective review identified four patients with silent sinus syndrome evaluated between June 1999 and August 2001. Patients presented to our ophthalmology department with ocular asymmetry, and computerized tomography (CT) scanning confirmed the diagnosis in each case. Results There were three men and one woman, with ages ranging from 27 to 40 years. All patients underwent endoscopic maxillary antrostomy. Preoperative enophthalmos determined by Hertel's measurements ranged from 3 to 4 mm. After endoscopic maxillary antrostomy, the range of reduction in enophthalmos was 1–2 mm. Case 2 had a preoperative CT scan and a CT scan 9 months after left endoscopic maxillary antrostomy. Volumetric analysis of the left maxillary sinus revealed a preoperative volume of 16.85 ± 0.06 cm3 and a postoperative volume of 19.56 ± 0.07 cm3. This represented a 16% increase in maxillary sinus volume postoperatively. Orbital floor augmentation was avoided in two patients because of satisfactory improvement in enophthalmos. In the other two patients, orbital reconstruction was performed as a second-stage procedure. There were no complications. Conclusion Orbital floor augmentation can be offered as a second-stage procedure for patients with silent sinus syndrome. Some patients’ enophthalmos may improve with endoscopic antrostomy alone.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document