A Randomized Trial of Medical Care With and Without Physical Therapy and Chiropractic Care With and Without Physical Modalities for Patients With Low Back Pain: 6-Month Follow-Up Outcomes From the UCLA Low Back Pain Study

Spine ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 27 (20) ◽  
pp. 2193-2204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric L. Hurwitz ◽  
Hal Morgenstern ◽  
Philip Harber ◽  
Gerald F. Kominski ◽  
Thomas R. Belin ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Cecchi ◽  
Raffaello Molino-Lova ◽  
Massimiliano Chiti ◽  
Guido Pasquini ◽  
Anita Paperini ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis E Enix ◽  
Kasey L Sudkamp ◽  
Theodore K Malmstrom ◽  
Joseph H Flaherty

Abstract Background Postural control problems effect between 28% and 35% of individuals over the age 65 and increases with age. Musculoskeletal pain in the elderly impacts 20% to 49% of people between the ages of 65 and 75, is a leading falls risk factor, and a robust predictor of morbidity. Polypharmacy in the management of chronic pain is common in the geriatric population. Conservative treatment options for balance and back pain are underrepresented in scientific literature. Methods The methods and demographics for a prospective, randomized controlled single blinded clinical trial are described. This study evaluated the use of either chiropractic care or physical therapy as a treatment for patients with balance problems and with low back pain (68.5%) or without low back pain (31.5%) in the geriatric population. One hundred and sixty eight consecutively enrolled community dwelling adults between 60 and 85 years old (72.8 +/- 6.8) were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of either chiropractic care or physical therapy (12 - 18 visits). Testing occurred prior to randomization, after 6 weeks of treatment, and again 6 weeks later. Functional and self-report outcome measures for balance included the Berg Balance Scale, Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment, Timed Up and Go Test, and NeuroCom balance tests. Pain was assessed with the Visual Analog Scale, 21-Point Box Scale, and pressure algometry. Quality of life healthcare questionnaires included the Oswestry, the SF-36, and the Falls Efficacy Scale for confidence in performing everyday activities. Data analysis for this intent-to-treat design was a mixed-model analysis of variance (ANOVA) (p < 0.05) and Bonferroni correction (p < 0.017 and p < 0.025). This study was set in a university biomedical and healthcare research facility and university ethics committee approval was obtained and written informed consent was given by all study participants. Conclusion The methodology of this multimodal treatment protocol for balance disorders and low back pain in the geriatric population and patient demographics are described in this paper. Additional research in this area is needed for this growing at risk population. Trial registration NCT02031562.


2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 150-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Azadinia ◽  
Ismail Ebrahimi-Takamjani ◽  
Mojtaba Kamyab ◽  
Mohamad Parnianpour ◽  
Morteza Asgari ◽  
...  

Spine ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 611-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric L. Hurwitz ◽  
Hal Morgenstern ◽  
Gerald F. Kominski ◽  
Fei Yu ◽  
Lu-May Chiang

2010 ◽  
Vol 90 (12) ◽  
pp. 1717-1729 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Thackeray ◽  
Julie M. Fritz ◽  
Gerard P. Brennan ◽  
Faisel M. Zaman ◽  
Stuart E. Willick

BackgroundTherapeutic selective nerve root blocks (SNRBs) are a common intervention for patients with sciatica. Patients often are referred to physical therapy after SNRBs, although the effectiveness of this intervention sequence has not been investigated.ObjectiveThis study was a preliminary investigation of the effectiveness of SNRBs, with or without subsequent physical therapy, in people with low back pain and sciatica.DesignThis investigation was a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial.SettingThe settings were spine specialty and physical therapy clinics.ParticipantsForty-four participants (64% men; mean age=38.5 years, SD=11.6 years) with low back pain, with clinical and imaging findings consistent with lumbar disk herniation, and scheduled to receive SNRBs participated in the study. They were randomly assigned to receive either 4 weeks of physical therapy (SNRB+PT group) or no physical therapy (SNRB alone [SNRB group]) after the injections.InterventionAll participants received at least 1 SNRB; 28 participants (64%) received multiple injections. Participants in the SNRB+PT group attended an average of 6.0 physical therapy sessions over an average of 23.9 days.MeasurementsOutcomes were assessed at baseline, 8 weeks, and 6 months with the Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire, a numeric pain rating scale, and the Global Rating of Change.ResultsSignificant reductions in pain and disability occurred over time in both groups, with no differences between groups at either follow-up for any outcome. Nine participants (5 in the SNRB group and 4 in the SNRB+PT group) underwent surgery during the follow-up period.LimitationsThe limitations of this study were a relatively short-term follow-up period and a small sample size.ConclusionsA physical therapy intervention after SNRBs did not result in additional reductions in pain and disability or perceived improvements in participants with low back pain and sciatica.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. e180105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine M. Goertz ◽  
Cynthia R. Long ◽  
Robert D. Vining ◽  
Katherine A. Pohlman ◽  
Joan Walter ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric L. Hurwitz ◽  
Hal Morgenstern ◽  
Philip Harber ◽  
Gerald F. Kominski ◽  
Thomas R. Belin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document