LEFT HEMIHEPATECTOMY IN LIVING DONORS WITH A THICK MIDDLE HEPATIC VEIN DRAINING THE CAUDAL HALF OF THE RIGHT LIVER

2000 ◽  
Vol 69 (7) ◽  
pp. 1499-1501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ai-Min Hui ◽  
Masatoshi Makuuchi ◽  
Tadatoshi Takayama ◽  
Keiji Sano ◽  
Keiichi Kubota ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 88 (1) ◽  
pp. 144-145
Author(s):  
Hirotaka Tashiro ◽  
Toshiyuki Itamoto ◽  
Hironobu Amano ◽  
Akihiko Oshita ◽  
Tsuyoshi Kobayashi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masaharu Kogure ◽  
Takaaki Arai ◽  
Hirokazu Momose ◽  
Ryota Matsuki ◽  
Yutaka Suzuki ◽  
...  

Major hepatectomy in patients with insufficient future liver remnant (FLR) volume and impaired liver functional reserve has considerable risks for posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). The patient was a male in his 70 with an intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) in left hemiliver, involving the middle hepatic vein (MHV). Although FLR volume after left hemihepatectomy was estimated to be 64.4% of the total liver volume, an indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min (ICG-R15) value was 24.2%, thus the patient underwent left portal vein embolization (PVE). The FLR volume increased to 71.3%, however, the non-congestive FLR volume was re-estimated as 45.8% after resection of the MHV, the ICG-R15 value was 29.0%, and ICG-Krem was calculated as 0.037. We performed partial rescue ALPPS (Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein occlusion for Staged hepatectomy) for left hemihepatectomy with the MHV reconstruction. On the first stage, partial liver partition was done along Rex-Cantlie’s line, preserving the MHV and sacrificing the remaining branches to segment 8. The FLR volume increased to 77.4% on day 14. The ICG-R15 value was 29.6%, but ICG-Krem after MHV reconstruction was estimated to be 0.059. The second stage operation on day 21 was left hemihepatectomy with the MHV reconstruction using the left superficial femoral vein graft. The usage of rescue partial ALPPS may contribute to preventing PHLF by introducing occlusion of the portal and/or venous branches in the left hemiliver before curative hepatectomy.


2003 ◽  
Vol 75 (9) ◽  
pp. 1598-1600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro Kido ◽  
Yonson Ku ◽  
Takumi Fukumoto ◽  
Masahiro Tominaga ◽  
Takeshi Iwasaki ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 154 (36) ◽  
pp. 1417-1425
Author(s):  
Attila Szijártó ◽  
Yasuhiro Fujimoto ◽  
Kirino Izumi ◽  
Uemoto Shinji

Introduction: Due to the limited number of cadaver donors, adult living liver donor transplantation became an alternative for liver transplantation. During living liver donor transplantation, the safety and uncomplicated recovery of the donor are as important as the appropriate volume and weight of the donated graft. The middle hepatic vein causes a significant dilemma, due to the special anatomical position. The reconstruction of the middle hepatic vein branches supplying S5, S8 is suggested when the anatomically right liver lobe is transplanted. Aim: The aim of the present study was to investigate the requirements of the reconstruction of middle hepatic vein and to give an accurate description about the discrepancy between the portal vein in- and outflow. Method: The authors analyzed the liver anatomic characteristics of 130 donors undergoing living liver donor transplantation with the use of MeVis software. The so-called porto-hepatic disparity index (shift) was introduced. Results: The right hepatic vein was dominant in 64.6% of all cases, while the left hepatic vein was never observed to be dominant. The territories of V5 and V8 were responsible for the 33.2±8.9% of the right hepatic lobe area. The correlation between portal venous territory and vein dominancy were as follows: R2= 0.7811 in the left liver lobe; R² = 0.5463 in the area of middle hepatic vein and R² = 0.5843 in the case of the right hepatic vein. The average value of the shift was 28.2%. Conclusions: The differences among the pattern of portal in- and hepatic outflow is an important issue that should be taken into consideration when deciding the necessity for reconstruction of the middle hepatic vein. Orv. Hetil., 2013, 154, 1417–1425.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document