The effect of head and neck reconstruction on quality of life

Author(s):  
Mark K. Wax ◽  
Larry L. Myers ◽  
Peter E. Andersen ◽  
James I. Cohen
2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 341-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia R. Albornoz ◽  
Andrea L. Pusic ◽  
Patrick Reavey ◽  
Amie M. Scott ◽  
Anne F. Klassen ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (5) ◽  
pp. 874-880 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Bozec ◽  
Gilles Poissonnet ◽  
Emmanuel Chamorey ◽  
Cédric Casanova ◽  
Jacques Vallicioni ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 145-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Ferri ◽  
E. Segna ◽  
A. Varazzani ◽  
C. Copelli ◽  
S. Valsecchi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (06) ◽  
pp. 715-721
Author(s):  
Weitao Wang ◽  
Tom Shokri ◽  
Aurora Vincent ◽  
Allison Vest ◽  
Fayette Williams ◽  
...  

AbstractRehabilitation of head and neck defects following trauma, oncologic resection, or congenital malformation is a challenging task. Not only is the restoration of three-dimensional form necessary for acceptable cosmesis, but simultaneous restoration of functional speech and swallow is also essential for optimal reconstruction outcomes. While advances in free tissue transfer have allowed surgical reconstruction of head and neck defects once considered inoperable and associated with poor quality of life, not all patients are ideal surgical candidates. As such, nonsurgical solutions to both functional and cosmetic restoration remain a necessary alternative option. Facial prostheses and palatomaxillary obturators have evolved with increasingly biocompatible materials as well as retention systems to address significant defects that challenge the limits of surgical reconstruction.


2006 ◽  
Vol 22 (03) ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Pons ◽  
J. Masia ◽  
J. Sancho ◽  
J. Larrañaga ◽  
P. Serret

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document