Philips Gamma Camera Systems

2012 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 28
Keyword(s):  
2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (8) ◽  
pp. 1529-1540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Livia Tossici-Bolt ◽  
John C. Dickson ◽  
Terez Sera ◽  
Robin de Nijs ◽  
Maria Claudia Bagnara ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yves D'Asseler ◽  
Stefaan Vandenberghe ◽  
Michel Koole ◽  
Luc Bouwens ◽  
Rik Van de Walle ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-52
Author(s):  
R. Valkema ◽  
H. Prpic ◽  
J. A. K. Blokland ◽  
J. A. J. Camps ◽  
S. E. Papapoulos ◽  
...  

A gamma camera was equipped with a special collimator and arm assembly for bone mineral measurements with dual photon absorptiometry (DPA). The system was evaluated in vitro and in vivo and compared both with a rectilinear DPA and a dual energy X-ray (DEXA) system. All 3 systems showed a linear response in measurements of 4 vials, containing different amounts of hydroxyapatite. Phantom measurements with the gamma camera system showed a precision of 1.6% to 2.8%. Results obtained in 8 healthy volunteers with rectilinear and gamma camera systems were well correlated (R2 = 0.78). With the photon beam directed from posterior to anterior, the separation of vertebrae was easy with the gamma camera system. We conclude that bone mineral measurements can be made with a gamma camera for assessment of fracture risk and in the decision process whether a patient needs treatment or not. For follow-up, the precision of DPA with a gamma camera is inadequate.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document