scholarly journals COMPARISON OF PARTIAL SEATED SALINE INFUSION TEST AND SEATED SALINE INFUSION TEST FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF PRIMARY ALDOSTERONISM

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. e404
Author(s):  
Keli Li ◽  
Luo Qin ◽  
Nanfang Li
2014 ◽  
Vol 122 (03) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Weigel ◽  
A Riester ◽  
G Hanslik ◽  
K Lang ◽  
S Endres ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 507-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reiko Hayashi ◽  
Daisuke Tamada ◽  
Masahiko Murata ◽  
Kosuke Mukai ◽  
Tetsuhiro Kitamura ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 92 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuan Lin ◽  
Jun Yang ◽  
Peter J. Fuller ◽  
Huan Jing ◽  
Ying Song ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 172 (4) ◽  
pp. 443-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne Weigel ◽  
Anna Riester ◽  
Gregor Hanslik ◽  
Katharina Lang ◽  
Holger S Willenberg ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe saline infusion test (SIT) is widely used as a confirmatory test for primary aldosteronism (PA). SIT results are judged as follows: post-test aldosterone levels <50 ng/l exclude PA, whereas levels >50 ng/l confirm PA. We hypothesized that post-SIT aldosterone concentrations indicate the severity of PA and might predict outcome.DesignThe study includes 256 PA patients of the German Conn's Registry who prospectively underwent SIT. The data of 126 patients with complete follow-up of 1.2±0.3 years after diagnosis were analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups with post-SIT aldosterone levels of 50–100 ng/l (group 1; n=38) and of >100 ng/l (group 2; n=88).ResultsPatients in group 2 had a significantly shorter duration of hypertension (7.5 vs 11.7 years (median), P=0.014), higher systolic blood pressure (BP; 151±16 vs 143±17 mmHg, P=0.036), lower serum potassium (3.3±0.6 vs 3.5±0.4 mmol/l, P=0.006), higher 24-h urine protein excretion (7.4 vs 5.4 mg/dl (median), P=0.012), and were more often female (P=0.038). They showed more often unilateral disease (P<0.005) with larger tumors (14±10 vs 7±10 mm, P=0.021), underwent more often adrenalectomy (75% vs 37%, P<0.005), required a lower number of antihypertensive drugs after adrenalectomy (1.2±1.2 vs 2.5±1.4, P=0.001), had a faster normalization of urinary protein excretion (with medical treatment P=0.049; with Adx P<0.005) at follow-up, and more frequently underlying well-characterized mutation (P=0.047).ConclusionsPA patients with post-SIT aldosterone levels of >100 ng/l have a more rapid development of PA caused more frequently by unilateral disease with larger aldosterone-producing adenomas. However, this group of patients may have a significantly better outcome following specific treatment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. 737-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroki Kaneko ◽  
Hironobu Umakoshi ◽  
Yuki Ishihara ◽  
Taku Sugawa ◽  
Kazutaka Nanba ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fuss Carmina Teresa ◽  
Katharina Brohm ◽  
Max Kurlbaum ◽  
Anke Hannemann ◽  
Sabine Kendl ◽  
...  

Endocrine ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 802-806 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazutaka Nanba ◽  
Mika Tsuiki ◽  
Hironobu Umakoshi ◽  
Aya Nanba ◽  
Yuusuke Hirokawa ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. e348
Author(s):  
Kaoru Yamashita ◽  
Midori Yatabe ◽  
Yasufumi Seki ◽  
Kanako Bokuda ◽  
Daisuke Watanabe ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Zhang ◽  
Tao Chen ◽  
Haoming Tian ◽  
Yuanmei Li ◽  
Dan Mo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: None of the diagnostic tests for primary aldosteronism (PA) are ideal according to the current literature. In a preliminary study, the seated saline infusion test (SSIT) was more sensitive than the recumbent saline infusion test (RSIT) for the diagnosis and subtype classification of PA. However, it is unclear whether the SSIT is suitable for Chinese PA patients. Objective: We prospectively investigated the accuracy of the seated saline infusion test (SSIT) in 113 patients with hypertension (including 93 PA and 20 essential hypertension (EH) patients) in the Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism. Approach and Results: Each patient underwent an recumbent saline infusion test (RSIT) and seated saline infusion test (SSIT). The accuracy of the SSIT for a confirmative primary aldosteronism (PA) diagnosis and subtype classification was evaluated and compared with the RSIT. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of aldosterone for the SSIT was significantly greater than that for the RSIT (0.945±0.0199 vs 0.828±0.0404; P&lt;0.05). The ROC analysis showed that the optimal plasma aldosterone cutoff values were 12.94 ng/dl for the SSIT (sensitivity 86.02%, specificity 95%; Youden index (YI)=0.810) and 12.04 ng/dl for the RSIT (sensitivity 83.15%, specificity 57%; Youden index (YI)=0.401). The optimal aldosterone concentration cutoff value for classifying aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) and idiopathic hyperaldosteronism (IHA) was 18.12 ng/dl for the SSIT (sensitivity 73.5%, specificity 79.5%). No patients experienced adverse events during the SSIT. Conclusions: The SSIT was safe and convenient for PA diagnosis. The accuracy of the SSIT for a confirmatory diagnosis of PA was better than that of the RSIT. The SSIT is a reliable alternative for PA confirmation in Chinese individuals.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Munire Adilijiang ◽  
Qin Luo ◽  
Menghui Wang ◽  
Delian Zhang ◽  
Xiaoguang Yao ◽  
...  

Context. Failure of plasma aldosterone suppression during the saline infusion test (SIT) confirms primary aldosteronism (PA); recommendations for diagnostic strategies are currently controversial in the case of an inconclusive test result with a post-SIT PAC 5–10 ng/dl, while the renin change during SIT is not focused by the previous study. Objective. To clarify whether it has some hidden diagnostic values for PA, especially in the case of an inconclusive SIT result, we investigated the difference in changes of plasma renin activity (PRA) during SIT between patients with PA and non-PA. Methods. We measured and compared the SIT parameters of 159 PA patients, 368 non-PA patients, and 43 inconclusive patients who were included in this study. Results. The PA group showed a minor change of PRA during the SIT (ΔPRA, defined as (pre-SIT PRA–post-SIT PRA)) compared with the non-PA group (0.17 ng/ml/h vs. 1.07 ng/ml/h, P < 0.001 ). According to ROC analysis, ΔPRA showed a greater AUC than post-SIT PRA (0.897 vs. 0.855, P < 0.001 ). The cutoff value was 0.5 ng/ml/h, with 90.3% sensitivity and 78.6% specificity. When combined with ARR post-SIT, it showed 81.6% sensitivity and 97.0% specificity for PA diagnosis. Further analysis of 43 patients with an inconclusive SIT result who completed AVS found that ΔPRA was smaller in the confirmed PA group compared with the unconfirmed PA group (0.19 ng/ml/h vs. 0.29 ng/ml/h, P < 0.05 ); there was no significant difference in PAC post-SIT between two groups. ΔPRA ≤ 0.21 ng/ml/h provides 71.4% sensitivity, 80.0% specificity, and 87.0% PPV for their PA diagnosis. Conclusions. PA patients show minor PRA change during SIT; the change of PRA during SIT provides an auxiliary diagnostic value for PA, especially in patients with an inconclusive SIT result.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document