Prediction of Lower Pole Stone Clearance After Shock Wave Lithotripsy Using an Artificial Neural Network

2003 ◽  
Vol 169 (4) ◽  
pp. 1250-1256 ◽  
Author(s):  
VASSILIS POULAKIS ◽  
PHILIPP DAHM ◽  
ULRICH WITZSCH ◽  
RACHELLE de VRIES ◽  
JOCHEM REMPLIK ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefanos Albanis ◽  
Hammad M. Ather ◽  
Athanasios G. Papatsoris ◽  
Junaid Masood ◽  
Dimitrios Staios ◽  
...  

Urology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. S363-S364
Author(s):  
M. Abdel Aziz ◽  
N. Aljawini ◽  
A. Meabed ◽  
M. Almosa ◽  
S. Althegafi ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 172 (3) ◽  
pp. 1082-1086 ◽  
Author(s):  
BÜLENT ÖNAL ◽  
OKTAY DEMIRKESEN ◽  
NEJAT TANSU ◽  
MEHMET KALKAN ◽  
RAMAZAN ALTINTAŞ ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 168 (4 Part 1) ◽  
pp. 1344-1347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuhiro Sumino ◽  
Hiromitsu Mimata ◽  
Yoshihisa Tasaki ◽  
Hitoshi Ohno ◽  
Tetsuji Hoshino ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Vincent G. Bird ◽  
Michael S. Borofsky

This chapter summarizes the results of the Lower Pole Study I study in which patients with symptomatic lower pole renal calculi were randomized to receive extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The study found that patients receiving ESWL had lower stone-clearance rates and a more frequent need for retreatment but lower morbidity, whereas those receiving PCNL had higher stone-clearance rate and fewer retreatments but greater morbidity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document