Flat-Panel Volume Computed Tomography for Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Examination in Isolated Temporal Bone Specimens

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 491-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soenke H. Bartling ◽  
Rajiv Gupta ◽  
Attila Torkos ◽  
Christian Dullin ◽  
Grabbe Eckhardt ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 491-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soenke H. Bartling ◽  
Rajiv Gupta ◽  
Attila Torkos ◽  
Christian Dullin ◽  
Grabbe Eckhardt ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 169-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antje Aschendorff ◽  
Robert Briggs ◽  
Goetz Brademann ◽  
Silke Helbig ◽  
Joachim Hornung ◽  
...  

Aims: The Nucleus CI532 cochlear implant incorporates a new precurved electrode array, i.e., the Slim Modiolar electrode (SME), which is designed to bring electrode contacts close to the medial wall of the cochlea while avoiding trauma due to scalar dislocation or contact with the lateral wall during insertion. The primary aim of this prospective study was to determine the final position of the electrode array in clinical cases as evaluated using flat-panel volume computed tomography. Methods: Forty-five adult candidates for unilateral cochlear implantation were recruited from 8 centers. Eleven surgeons attended a temporal bone workshop and received further training with a transparent plastic cochlear model just prior to the first surgery. Feedback on the surgical approach and use of the SME was collected via a questionnaire for each case. Computed tomography of the temporal bone was performed postoperatively using flat-panel digital volume tomography or cone beam systems. The primary measure was the final scalar position of the SME (completely in scala tympani or not). Secondly, medial-lateral position and insertion depth were evaluated. Results: Forty-four subjects received a CI532. The SME was located completely in scala tympani for all subjects. Pure round window (44% of the cases), extended round window (22%), and inferior and/or anterior cochleostomy (34%) approaches were successful across surgeons and cases. The SME was generally positioned close to the modiolus. Overinsertion of the array past the first marker tended to push the basal contacts towards the lateral wall and served only to increase the insertion depth of the first electrode contact without increasing the insertion depth of the most apical electrode. Complications were limited to tip fold-overs encountered in 2 subjects; both were attributed to surgical error, with both reimplanted successfully. Conclusions: The new Nucleus CI532 cochlear implant with SME achieved the design goal of producing little or no trauma as indicated by consistent scala tympani placement. Surgeons should be carefully trained to use the new deployment method such that tip fold-overs and over insertion may be avoided.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Arweiler-Harbeck ◽  
Christoph Mönninghoff ◽  
Jens Greve ◽  
Thomas Hoffmann ◽  
Sophia Göricke ◽  
...  

Background. Postoperative imaging after cochlear implantation is usually performed by conventional cochlear view (X-ray) or by multislice computed tomography (MSCT). MSCT after cochlear implantation often provides multiple metal artefacts; thus, a more detailed view of the implant considering the given anatomy is desirable. A quite new method is flat panel volume computed tomography. The aim of the study was to evaluate the method’s clinical use. Material and Methods. After cochlear implantation with different implant types, flat panel CT scan (Philips Allura) was performed in 31 adult patients. Anatomical details, positioning, and resolution of the different electrode types (MedEL, Advanced Bionics, and Cochlear) were evaluated interdisciplinary (ENT/Neuroradiology). Results. In all 31 patients cochlear implant electrode array and topographical position could be distinguished exactly. Spatial resolution and the high degree of accuracy were superior to reported results of MSCT. Differentiation of cochlear scalae by identification of the osseous spiral lamina was possible in some cases. Scanning artefacts were low. Conclusion. Flat panel CT scan allows exact imaging independent of implant type. This is mandatory for detailed information on cochlear electrode position. It enables us to perform optimal auditory nerve stimulation and allows feed back on surgical quality concerning the method of electrode insertion.


2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 152-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annett Trieger ◽  
Anja Schulze ◽  
Matthias Schneider ◽  
Thomas Zahnert ◽  
Dirk Mürbe

2009 ◽  
Vol 38 (10) ◽  
pp. 1003-1008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnold C. Cheung ◽  
Miriam A. Bredella ◽  
Ma’moun Al Khalaf ◽  
Michael Grasruck ◽  
Christianne Leidecker ◽  
...  

PLoS Genetics ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
pp. e118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Dullin ◽  
Jeannine Missbach-Guentner ◽  
Wolfgang F Vogel ◽  
Eckhardt Grabbe ◽  
Frauke Alves

2007 ◽  
Vol 34 (6Part23) ◽  
pp. 2634-2634 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Alspaugh ◽  
E Christodoulou ◽  
M Goodsitt ◽  
J Stayman

HNO ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Rotter ◽  
B. Schmitz ◽  
F. Sommer ◽  
S. Röhrer ◽  
P. J. Schuler ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document