scholarly journals Antimicrobial Stewardship: A Modified Team-Based Learning Curriculum With Timeouts for the Inpatient Medicine Clerkship

2021 ◽  
Vol 96 (11S) ◽  
pp. S202-S203
Author(s):  
Emily Cantor ◽  
Satya Patel ◽  
Pamela Tsing ◽  
Tyler Larsen
2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 1179-1185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Gonzaga Tulloch ◽  
Anju Relan ◽  
Jennifer Curello ◽  
Elise Martin ◽  
Roma Patel ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nora Y. Osman ◽  
Jessica L. Walling ◽  
Vivian G. Mitchell ◽  
Erik K. Alexander

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S40-S40
Author(s):  
Peter Chin-Hong ◽  
Arianne Teherani ◽  
David Irby ◽  
Brian Schwartz

Abstract Background By 2050, infections due antimicrobial-resistant organisms are predicted to account for 10 million deaths/year worldwide. Physician antibiotic prescribing patterns are a significant factor in the development of antibiotic resistance organisms. Early, continual, and integrated medical student education may help students develop a framework for responsible antimicrobial use as they develop prescribing patterns. Methods We designed a spiral antimicrobial stewardship curriculum (defined as revisiting the same concept but with increasing complexity) for medical students in years 2–4. Data provided by the Graduation Questionnaire (GQ) administered by the US Association of American Colleges were used. We compared student responses during the curriculum rollout in 2013–2015 between students at our institution and other schools. We also surveyed graduating seniors in 2015 about antimicrobial stewardship training. Results Using GQ data for the class of 2013 (preintervention), a similar proportion of UCSF medical students compared with other US medical students rated microbiology clinical preparation as excellent (43.6% vs. 45.1%, P > 0.20). For the 2014 class, we developed interactive case-based sessions at the beginning of years 3 and 4. After this first intervention, a higher proportion of UCSF students rated the microbiology clinical preparation as excellent (51.3%) compared with responses at all schools (39.8%, odds ratio [OR] 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1–2.3, P = 0.013). For the class of 2015, we added content during the medicine clerkship and 1 week before graduation. For the 2015 class, an even higher proportion of UCSF students rated microbiology preparation as excellent (57.6%), compared with all schools (41.2%, OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.54–3.22, P < 0.0001). From our survey, 88% were very or extremely satisfied with antimicrobial stewardship training. Conclusion A spiral curriculum focusing on antimicrobial stewardship and infectious diseases increases student perception of clinical preparation prior to graduation. As the curriculum was incrementally introduced, students’ knowledge increased indicating a dose–response pattern. Based on these positive results, we plan to introduce more content throughout UME, and link to curriculum for GME and practicing clinicians. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


MedEdPORTAL ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Bishop ◽  
Jeffrey Kushinka ◽  
Stephanie Call

Author(s):  
Arif Alper Cevik ◽  
Margaret ElZubeir ◽  
Fikri M. Abu-Zidan ◽  
Sami Shaban

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document