Bone Transport for Postinfectious Segmental Tibial Bone Defects With a Combined Ilizarov/Taylor Spatial Frame Technique

2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 162-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Sala ◽  
Ahmed M Thabet ◽  
Fabio Castelli ◽  
Anna N Miller ◽  
Dario Capitani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Defects ◽  
Bone Transport ◽  
Taylor Spatial Frame ◽  
Tibial Bone ◽  
Spatial Frame

scholarly journals The treatment of bone defects of the tibia by bone transport using a stacked Taylor Spatial Frame

Injury Extra ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-22
Author(s):  
R.M. Atkins ◽  
M. Jackson ◽  
J.A. Livingstone ◽  
F. Monsell ◽  
M.J. Rogers
Keyword(s):  
Bone Defects ◽  
Bone Transport ◽  
Taylor Spatial Frame ◽  
Spatial Frame

Ilizarov bone transport using an intramedullary cable transportation system in the treatment of tibial bone defects

Injury ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Rosteius ◽  
Simon Pätzholz ◽  
Valentin Rausch ◽  
Sebastian Lotzien ◽  
Björn Behr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Defects ◽  
Transportation System ◽  
Bone Transport ◽  
Tibial Bone ◽  
Ilizarov Bone Transport

scholarly journals Tibial bone defects treated by internal bone transport using the Ilizarov method

1998 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 293-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.-R. Song ◽  
S.-H. Cho ◽  
K.-H. Koo ◽  
S.-T. Jeong ◽  
Y.-J. Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Defects ◽  
Bone Transport ◽  
Ilizarov Method ◽  
Tibial Bone

Ilizarov bone transport versus fibular graft for reconstruction of tibial bone defects in children

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 556-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mostafa Abdelkhalek ◽  
Barakat El-Alfy ◽  
Ayman M. Ali
Keyword(s):  
Bone Defects ◽  
Bone Transport ◽  
Fibular Graft ◽  
Tibial Bone ◽  
Ilizarov Bone Transport

scholarly journals Bone transport versus acute shortening for the management of infected tibial bone defects: A meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongjie Wen ◽  
Shouyan Zhu ◽  
Canzhang Li ◽  
Yongqing Xu
Keyword(s):  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Functional Results ◽  
Bone Defects ◽  
Bone Transport ◽  
Bone Union ◽  
Fixation Index ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Tibial Bone ◽  
Acute Shortening

Abstract Background: The treatment for infected tibial bone defects can be a great challenge for the orthopaedic surgeon. This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety between bone transport (BT) and the acute shortening technique (AST) in the treatment of infected tibial bone defects.Methods: A literature survey was conducted by searching the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases together with the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and the Wanfang database for articles published up to 9 August 2019. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) was adapted to evaluate the bias and risks in each eligible study. The data of the external fixation index (EFI), bone grafting, bone and functional results, complications, bone union time and characteristics of participants were extracted. RevMan v.5.3 was used to perform relevant statistical analyses. Relative risk (RR) was used for the binary variables and standard mean difference (SMD) for continuous variables. Each variable included its 95% confidence interval (CI).Results: Five studies, including a total of 199 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. Statistical significance was observed in the EFI (SMD = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.25, 1.01, P = 0.001) and bone grafting (RR = 0.26, 95%CI: 0.15, 0.46, P <0.00001); however, no significance was observed in bone union time (SMD = –0.02, 95% CI: –0.39, 0.35, P = 0.92), bone results (RR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.91, 1.04, P = 0.41), functional results (RR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.86, 1.08, P = 0.50) and complications (RR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.41, 1.39, P = 0.37).Conclusions: AST is preferred from the aspect of minimising the treatment period, whereas BT is superior to AST for reducing bone grafting. Due to the limited number of trials, the meaning of this conclusion should be taken with caution for infected tibial bone defects.Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42019133659

scholarly journals Bone transport versus acute shortening for the management of infected tibial bone defects: a meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongjie Wen ◽  
Shouyan Zhu ◽  
Canzhang Li ◽  
Yongqing Xu
Keyword(s):  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Functional Results ◽  
Bone Defects ◽  
Bone Transport ◽  
Bone Union ◽  
Fixation Index ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Tibial Bone ◽  
Acute Shortening

Abstract Background: The treatment for infected tibial bone defects can be a great challenge for the orthopaedic surgeon. This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the safety and efficacy between bone transport (BT) and the acute shortening technique (AST) in the treatment of infected tibial bone defects. Methods: A literature survey was conducted by searching the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases together with the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and the Wanfang database for articles published up to 9 August 2019. The modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) was adapted to evaluate the bias and risks in each eligible study. The data of the external fixation index (EFI), bone grafting, bone and functional results, complications, bone union time and characteristics of participants were extracted. RevMan v.5.3 was used to perform relevant statistical analyses. Standard mean difference (SMD) was used for continuous variables and relative risk (RR) for the binary variables. All of the variables included its 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Five studies, including a total of 199 patients, were included in the study. Statistical significance was observed in the EFI (SMD = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.25, 1.01, P = 0.001) and bone grafting (RR = 0.26, 95%CI: 0.15, 0.46, P <0.00001); however, no significance was observed in bone union time (SMD = –0.02, 95% CI: –0.39, 0.35, P = 0.92), bone results (RR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.91, 1.04, P = 0.41), functional results (RR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.86, 1.08, P = 0.50) and complications (RR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.41, 1.39, P = 0.37). Conclusions: AST is preferred from the aspect of minimising the treatment period, whereas BT is superior to AST for reducing bone grafting. Due to the limited number of trials, the meaning of this conclusion should be taken with caution for infected tibial bone defects.

Matched Case–Control Comparison of Bone Transport Using External Fixator over a Nail versus External Fixator over a Plate for Segmental Tibial Bone Defects

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyeong-Hyeon Park ◽  
Chang-Wug Oh ◽  
Joon-Woo Kim ◽  
Jong-Keon Oh ◽  
Yong-Cheol Yoon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
External Fixator ◽  
Bone Defects ◽  
Bone Transport ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Tibial Bone ◽  
Control Comparison ◽  
Matched Case
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document