Preoperative Assessment for Complex Lower Limb Deformity

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. S12-S17
Author(s):  
Leo Donnan
2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianna Faggiani ◽  
Selena Desayeux ◽  
Giovanni Martino ◽  
Eraclite Petruccelli ◽  
Alessandro Aprato ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Viral V. Jain ◽  
Sarah Zawodny ◽  
James McCarthy
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hubert J. Oostenbroek ◽  
Ronald Brand ◽  
Peter M. van Roermund ◽  
René M. Castelein

2009 ◽  
Vol 80 (4) ◽  
pp. 435-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hubert J Oostenbroek ◽  
Ronald Brand ◽  
Peter M van Roermund

2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ross A. Fawdington ◽  
Ben Johnson ◽  
Nigel T. Kiely
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lau Chi-Kay ◽  
Chui King-him ◽  
Lee Kin-bong ◽  
Li Wilson

Post-traumatic limb deformity is often multiplanar and thus is a difficult pathology to deal with surgically. Precise preoperative planning and accurate intraoperative execution are two main important steps that lead to satisfactory outcome. Computer-assisted planning and three-dimensional-printed patient-specific instrumental guides provide excellent aid to the two steps, respectively. We report a case of posttraumatic lower limb deformity in a patient who underwent closing wedge corrective osteotomy with the aid of the aforementioned new technologies.


2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi-Kin Lo ◽  
Hok-Yin Li ◽  
Yiu-Chung Wong ◽  
Yuk-Leung Wai

Background/Purpose The iASSIST system is a novel navigation system for total knee replacement. It is based on accelerometers built within electronic pods attached to the instruments within the operative field. The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of iASSIST navigation with that of the conventional alignment technique. Methods A total of 91 patients (92 knees) retrospectively matched for age, gender, preoperative range of motion, and lower limb deformity underwent total knee replacement using iASSIST navigation (45 patients, 46 knees) or conventional instrumentation (46 patients, 46 knees). Operative time and radiological alignments were compared. Results The use of iASSIST navigation resulted in fewer outliners (as defined by >3° deviation from the neutral mechanical axis) in lower limb alignment. Operative time with iASSIST navigation was not longer than that using conventional instruments. Conclusion iASSIST navigation reduces the incidence of lower limb malalignment without adding extra time to the procedure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document